Selected article for: "activity performance and living activity"

Author: Vourganas, Ioannis; Stankovic, Vladimir; Stankovic, Lina
Title: Individualised Responsible Artificial Intelligence for Home-Based Rehabilitation
  • Cord-id: 3c64itep
  • Document date: 2020_12_22
  • ID: 3c64itep
    Snippet: Socioeconomic reasons post-COVID-19 demand unsupervised home-based rehabilitation and, specifically, artificial ambient intelligence with individualisation to support engagement and motivation. Artificial intelligence must also comply with accountability, responsibility, and transparency (ART) requirements for wider acceptability. This paper presents such a patient-centric individualised home-based rehabilitation support system. To this end, the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Five Time Sit To Stand (
    Document: Socioeconomic reasons post-COVID-19 demand unsupervised home-based rehabilitation and, specifically, artificial ambient intelligence with individualisation to support engagement and motivation. Artificial intelligence must also comply with accountability, responsibility, and transparency (ART) requirements for wider acceptability. This paper presents such a patient-centric individualised home-based rehabilitation support system. To this end, the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Five Time Sit To Stand (FTSTS) tests evaluate daily living activity performance in the presence or development of comorbidities. We present a method for generating synthetic datasets complementing experimental observations and mitigating bias. We present an incremental hybrid machine learning algorithm combining ensemble learning and hybrid stacking using extreme gradient boosted decision trees and k-nearest neighbours to meet individualisation, interpretability, and ART design requirements while maintaining low computation footprint. The model reaches up to 100% accuracy for both FTSTS and TUG in predicting associated patient medical condition, and 100% or 83.13%, respectively, in predicting area of difficulty in the segments of the test. Our results show an improvement of 5% and 15% for FTSTS and TUG tests, respectively, over previous approaches that use intrusive means of monitoring such as cameras.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • accuracy compare and low accuracy: 1, 2, 3
    • accuracy improve and low accuracy: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • accuracy misclassification and low accuracy: 1, 2, 3
    • accuracy result and low accuracy: 1, 2
    • accuracy score and low accuracy: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • accuracy term and low accuracy: 1, 2, 3
    • accuracy time improve and low accuracy: 1
    • accurately perform and low accuracy: 1
    • adapt ability and machine learn: 1
    • long period and low accuracy: 1