Selected article for: "healthcare outcome and high risk"

Author: Nathiya, Deepak; Suman, Supriya; Singh, Pratima; Raj, Preeti; Tomar, Balvir Singh
Title: Mental Health outcome and Professional quality of Life among Healthcare Worker during COVID-19 pandemic: A (FRONTLINE-COVID) survey
  • Cord-id: 28tq6y0v
  • Document date: 2021_1_6
  • ID: 28tq6y0v
    Snippet: Background. – Health care workers are under a substantial level of psychological impact due to the risk of exposure, workload and moral dilemmas as the nation is on upsurge of COVID-19 cases. Since there are limited research available on this issue from India, we have decided to conduct an online survey to evaluate mental health outcome and professional quality of life among healthcare worker during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. – From 25th May to 10th June 2020, a web-based (FRONT-LINE COVID)
    Document: Background. – Health care workers are under a substantial level of psychological impact due to the risk of exposure, workload and moral dilemmas as the nation is on upsurge of COVID-19 cases. Since there are limited research available on this issue from India, we have decided to conduct an online survey to evaluate mental health outcome and professional quality of life among healthcare worker during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. – From 25th May to 10th June 2020, a web-based (FRONT-LINE COVID) survey was conducted. Impact of event revised (IES-R), Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC) and Professional Quality of life (ProQOL) and Feeling related questions were administered among Healthcare workers from different departments of hospital. Results. – Among the respondents,218 (52.1%) belongs from the low-risk unit and 200 (47.9%) from the ‘high-risk unit’ including a higher proportion of nurses 191 (45.7%), female 282(67.5%), aged 31-40 years (48.3%), and married 220 (52.6%). Overall female nurses (P=>0.001), doctors (P=0.02) those were working in an emergency unit (P= <0.001) were at greater risk of psychological distress. Middle-aged (31- 40 years) had a higher level of resilience (p=0.02) contrast to this; working in COVID-19 unit was associated with a lower scale of resilience (p=0.009). Resilience and QoL were an important predictor for psychological distress. Conclusion. – Results implicate interventions for stress management and social support among medical staff working in the pandemic.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute respiratory syndrome and low resilience: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory syndrome and low satisfaction: 1