Author: O'Reilly, Gerard M; Mitchell, Rob D; Mitra, Biswadev; Akhlaghi, Hamed; Tran, Viet; Furyk, Jeremy S; Buntine, Paul; Wong, Anselm; Gangathimmaiah, Vinay; Knott, Jonathan; Moore, Allison; Ahn, Jung Ro; Chan, Quillan; Wang, Andrew; Goh, Han; Loughman, Ashley; Lowry, Nicole; Hackett, Liam; Sriâ€Ganeshan, Muhuntha; Chapman, Nicole; Raos, Maximilian; Noonan, Michael P; Smit, De Villiers; Cameron, Peter A
Title: Outcomes for emergency department patients with suspected and confirmed COVIDâ€19: An analysis of the Australian experience in 2020 (COVEDâ€5) Cord-id: 2csmifiz Document date: 2021_8_13
ID: 2csmifiz
Snippet: OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients presenting to Australian EDs with suspected and confirmed COVIDâ€19 during 2020, and to determine the predictors of inâ€hospital death for SARSâ€CoVâ€2 positive patients. METHODS: This analysis from the COVED Project presents data from 12 sites across four Australian states for the period from 1 April to 30 November 2020. All adult patients who met local criteria for suspected COVIDâ€19 and
Document: OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients presenting to Australian EDs with suspected and confirmed COVIDâ€19 during 2020, and to determine the predictors of inâ€hospital death for SARSâ€CoVâ€2 positive patients. METHODS: This analysis from the COVED Project presents data from 12 sites across four Australian states for the period from 1 April to 30 November 2020. All adult patients who met local criteria for suspected COVIDâ€19 and underwent testing for SARSâ€CoVâ€2 in the ED were eligible for inclusion. Study outcomes were mechanical ventilation and inâ€hospital mortality. RESULTS: Among 24 405 eligible ED presentations over the whole study period, 423 tested positive for SARSâ€CoVâ€2. During the ‘second wave’ from 1 July to 30 September 2020, 26 (6%) of 406 SARSâ€CoVâ€2 patients received invasive mechanical ventilation, compared to 175 (2%) of the 9024 SARSâ€CoVâ€2 negative patients (odds ratio [OR] 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3–5.2, P < 0.001), and 41 (10%) SARSâ€CoVâ€2 positive patients died in hospital compared to 312 (3%) SARSâ€CoVâ€2 negative patients (OR 3.2; 95% CI 2.2–4.4, P = 0.001). For SARSâ€CoVâ€2 positive patients, the strongest independent predictors of hospital death were age (OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.1–1.1, P < 0.001), higher triage category (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.3–9.4, P = 0.012), obesity (OR 4.2; 95% CI 1.2–14.3, P = 0.024) and receiving immunosuppressive treatment (OR 8.2; 95% CI 1.8–36.7, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: ED patients who tested positive for SARSâ€CoVâ€2 had higher odds of mechanical ventilation and death in hospital. The strongest predictors of death were age, a higher triage category, obesity and receiving immunosuppressive treatment.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- living risk and low number: 1
- logistic regression and low number: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date