Author: Kang, Keren; Huang, Lingfang; Ouyang, Chaolin; Du, Jiaming; Yang, Bin; Chi, Yaqin; He, Shuyu; Ying, Le; Chen, Guoling; Wang, Jihua
Title: Development, Performance Evaluation and Clinical Application of A Rapid SARSâ€CoVâ€2 IgM and IgG Test Kit Based on Automated Fluorescence Immunoassay Cord-id: 2hzb7amy Document date: 2020_11_24
ID: 2hzb7amy
Snippet: The ongoing COVIDâ€19 epidemic has made a huge impact on health, economies, and societies all over the world. Although RTâ€PCRâ€based nucleic acid detection has been primarily used in the diagnosis of COVIDâ€19, it is timeâ€consuming with limited application scenarios and must be operated by qualified personnel. Antibody test, particularly pointâ€ofâ€care antibody testing, is a suitable complement to nucleic acid test as it provides rapid, portable, and costâ€effective detection of infec
Document: The ongoing COVIDâ€19 epidemic has made a huge impact on health, economies, and societies all over the world. Although RTâ€PCRâ€based nucleic acid detection has been primarily used in the diagnosis of COVIDâ€19, it is timeâ€consuming with limited application scenarios and must be operated by qualified personnel. Antibody test, particularly pointâ€ofâ€care antibody testing, is a suitable complement to nucleic acid test as it provides rapid, portable, and costâ€effective detection of infections. In this study, a rapid antibody test kit was developed based on fluorescence immunochromatography for the sensitive, accurate, and automated detection of IgM and IgG antibodies against SARSâ€CoVâ€2 in human serum, plasma, and whole blood samples within 10 minutes. The sensitivity, specificity, precision, and stability of the test kit were of good performance. No crossâ€activity and no interference was observed. In the multipleâ€center parallel study, 223 samples from hospitalized patients were used to evaluate the clinical specificity of the test. Both SARSâ€CoVâ€2 IgM and IgG achieved a clinical specificity of 98.21%. The clinical sensitivities of SARSâ€CoVâ€2 IgM and IgG were 79.54% and 87.45%, respectively, among 733 RTâ€PCR confirmed SARSâ€Covâ€2 samples. For the combined IgM and IgG assays, the sensitivity and specificity were 89.22% and 96.86%, respectively. Our results demonstrate that the combined use of IgM and IgG could serve as a more suitable alternative detection method for COVIDâ€19 patients, and the developed kit is of great public health significance for the prevention and control of the COVIDâ€19 pandemic. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- accurate identification and acid detection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- accurate identification and acid testing: 1, 2
- accurate identification and acute sars cov respiratory syndrome coronavirus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
- acid detection and acute sars cov respiratory syndrome coronavirus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acid testing and acute sars cov respiratory syndrome coronavirus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute sars cov respiratory syndrome coronavirus and longitudinal change: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date