Selected article for: "cardiac safety and potential risk"

Author: Lachlan, Thomas He Hejie Aggour Hesham Sahota Preet Harvey Samuel Patel Kiran Foster Will Yusuf Shamil Panikker Sandeep Dhanjal Tarv Dandekar Uday Barker Thomas Parmar Jitendra Kuehl Michael Osman Faizel
Title: Safety and feasibility of trans-venous cardiac device extraction using conscious sedation alone—Implications for the post-COVID-19 era
  • Cord-id: 1585i60j
  • Document date: 2021_1_1
  • ID: 1585i60j
    Snippet: Abstract Background Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) for implantable cardiac-devices is traditionally performed under general anesthesia (GA). This can lead to greater risk of exposure to COVID-19, longer recovery-times and increased procedural-costs. We report the feasibility/safety of TLE using conscious-sedation alone with immediate GA/cardiac-surgery back-up if needed. Methods Retrospective case-series of consecutive TLEs performed using conscious-sedation alone between March 2016 and Decem
    Document: Abstract Background Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) for implantable cardiac-devices is traditionally performed under general anesthesia (GA). This can lead to greater risk of exposure to COVID-19, longer recovery-times and increased procedural-costs. We report the feasibility/safety of TLE using conscious-sedation alone with immediate GA/cardiac-surgery back-up if needed. Methods Retrospective case-series of consecutive TLEs performed using conscious-sedation alone between March 2016 and December 2019. All were performed in the electrophysiology-laboratory using intravenous Fentanyl, Midazolam/Diazepam with a stepwise approach using locking-stylets/cutting-sheaths, including mechanical-sheaths. Baseline patient-characteristics, procedural-details and TLE outcomes (including procedure-related complications/death) were recorded. Results A total of 130 leads were targeted in 54 patients, mean age ± SD 74.6 ± 11.8years, 47(87%) males;dual-chamber pacemakers (n = 26;48%), cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators (n = 17;31%) and defibrillators (n = 8;15%) were commonest extracted devices. Mean ± SD/median (range) lead-dwell times were 11.0 ± 8.8/8.3 (0.3-37) years, respectively. Extraction indications included systemic infection (n = 23;43%) and lead/pulse-generator erosion (n = 27;50%);mean 2.1 ± 2.0 leads were removed per procedure/mean procedure-time was 100 ± 54 min. Local anesthetic (LA) was used for all (mean-dose: 33 ± 8 ml 1% lidocaine), IV drug-doses used (mean ± SD) were: midazolam: 3.95 ± 2.44 mg, diazepam: 4.69 ± 0.89 mg and fentanyl: 57 ± 40 µg. Complete lead-extraction was achieved in 110 (85%) leads, partial lead-extraction (<4 cm-fragment remaining) in 5 (4%) leads. Sedation-related hypotension requiring IV fluids occurred in 2 (managed without adverse-consequences) and hypoxia requiring additional airway-management in none. No procedural deaths occurred, one patient required emergency cardiac surgery for localized ventricular perforation, nine had minor complications (transient hypotension/bradycardia/pericardial effusion not requiring intervention). Conclusion TLE undertaken using LA/conscious-sedation was safe/feasible in our series and associated with good clinical outcome/low procedural complications. Reduced risk of aerosolization of COVID-19 and quicker patient recovery/reduced anesthetic risk are potential benefits that warrant further study.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Try single phrases listed below for: 1