Selected article for: "present study and SARS CoV test"

Author: Paajanen, J.; Mäkinen, L.K.; Suikkila, A.; Rehell, M.; Javanainen, M.; Lindahl, A.; Kekäläinen, E.; Kurkela, S.; Halmesmäki, K.; Anttila, V.-J.; Lamminmäki, S.
Title: Isolation precautions cause minor delays in diagnostics and treatment of non-COVID patients
  • Cord-id: 4f2z69jv
  • Document date: 2021_10_5
  • ID: 4f2z69jv
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: Isolation precautions are essential prevent spread of COVID-19 infection but may have a negative impact on inpatient care. The impact of these measures on non-COVID-19 patients remains largely unexplored. AIM: This study aimed to investigate diagnostic and treatment delays related to isolation precautions, the associated patient outcome, and the predisposing risk factors for delays. METHODS: This observational study was conducted in seven Helsinki region hospitals during the first wa
    Document: BACKGROUND: Isolation precautions are essential prevent spread of COVID-19 infection but may have a negative impact on inpatient care. The impact of these measures on non-COVID-19 patients remains largely unexplored. AIM: This study aimed to investigate diagnostic and treatment delays related to isolation precautions, the associated patient outcome, and the predisposing risk factors for delays. METHODS: This observational study was conducted in seven Helsinki region hospitals during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland. The study used data on all non-COVID-19 inpatients, who were initially isolated due to suspected COVID-19, to estimate whether isolation precautions resulted in diagnostic or treatment delays. RESULTS: Out of 683 non-COVID-19 patients, 33 (4.8%) had delays related to isolation precautions. Clinical condition deteriorated non-fatally in seven (1.0%) patients. The following events were associated with an increased risk of treatment or a diagnostic delay: more than three ward transfers (P = 0.025); referral to an incorrect speciality in the emergency department (P = 0.004); more than three SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests performed (P = 0.022); and where cancer was the final diagnosis (P = 0.018). In contrast, lower respiratory tract symptoms (P = 0.013) decreased the risk. CONCLUSIONS: The use of isolation precautions for patients who did not have COVID-19 had minor negative effects on patient outcomes. The present study underlines the importance of targeting diagnostic efforts to patients with unspecified symptoms and to those with a negative SARS-CoV-2 test result. Thorough investigations to achieve an accurate diagnosis improves the prognosis of patients and facilitates appropriate targeting of hospital resources.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abdominal pain and acute kidney injury presence: 1
    • abdominal pain and acute respiratory failure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • abdominal pain and acute respiratory symptom: 1, 2
    • abdominal pain and admission prior: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • abdominal pain and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • abdominal pain and long hospital stay: 1
    • abdominal pain nausea and acute kidney injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • abdominal pain nausea and acute kidney injury presence: 1
    • abdominal pain nausea and acute respiratory failure: 1
    • abdominal pain nausea and admission prior: 1
    • abdominal pain nausea and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute kidney injury and adequate number: 1
    • acute kidney injury and admission prior: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • acute kidney injury and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute kidney injury and long duration: 1
    • acute kidney injury and long hospital stay: 1
    • acute kidney injury and long length: 1
    • acute kidney injury presence and logistic regression: 1
    • acute respiratory failure and long length: 1