Author: Carter, Jason A.; Freedenberg, Alex T.; Romeiser, Jamie L.; Talbot, Lillian R.; Browne, Nicholas J.; Cosgrove, Megan E.; Shevik, Margaret E.; Generale, Laura M.; Rago, Molly G.; Caravella, Giuseppina A.; Ahmed, Tahmeena; Mamone, Linda J.; Bennettâ€Guerrero, Elliott
Title: Impact of serological and PCR testing requirements on the selection of COVIDâ€19 convalescent plasma donors Cord-id: 2tjx4l2x Document date: 2021_2_8
ID: 2tjx4l2x
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Convalescent plasma is undergoing randomized trials as a potential therapeutic option for COVIDâ€19 infection. Little empirical evidence exists regarding the determination of donor eligibility and experiences with donor selection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in New York to select plasma donors for a randomized, doubleâ€blind, controlled convalescent plasma trial. Clearance for donation required successful completion of
Document: BACKGROUND: Convalescent plasma is undergoing randomized trials as a potential therapeutic option for COVIDâ€19 infection. Little empirical evidence exists regarding the determination of donor eligibility and experiences with donor selection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in New York to select plasma donors for a randomized, doubleâ€blind, controlled convalescent plasma trial. Clearance for donation required successful completion of an online questionnaire and an inâ€person screening visit, which included (a) completion of a Donor Health Questionnaire (DHQ), (b) Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody testing using an immunochromatographic anti†severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARSâ€CoVâ€2) test, (c) Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing if <28 days from symptom resolution, and (d) routine blood bank testing. RESULTS: After receiving 3093 online questionnaires, 521 individuals presented for inâ€person screening visits, with 40.1% (n = 209) fully qualifying. Subjects (n = 312) failed to progress due to the following reasons: disqualifying answer from DHQ (n = 30, 9.6%), insufficient antibodies (n = 198, 63.5%), persistent positive PCR tests (n = 14, 4.5%), and blood donation testing labs (n = 70, 22.4%). Importantly, 24.6% and 11.1% of potential donors who reported having PCRâ€diagnosed infection had low or undetectable SARSâ€CoVâ€2 antibody levels, respectively. Surprisingly, 62.9% (56/89) of subjects had positive PCR tests 14–27 days after symptom resolution, with 13 individuals continuing to be PCR positive after 27 days. CONCLUSION: It is feasible for a single site to fully qualify a large number of convalescent plasma donors in a short period of time. Among otherwise qualified convalescent plasma donors, we found high rates of low or undetectable antibody levels and many individuals with persistently positive PCR tests.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- active infection and additional testing: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date