Selected article for: "Evaluation Development Recommendations Assessment Grading GRADE and evidence quality"

Author: Golnaz Vaseghi; Marjan Mansourian; Raheleh Karimi; Kiyan Heshmat-Ghahdarijani; Sadegh Baradaran Mahdavi; Amirhossein Pezeshki; Behrooz Ataei; Alireza Zandifar; Omid Shafaat; Shaghayegh Haghjoo Javanmard
Title: Clinical characterization and chest CT findings in laboratory-confirmed COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Document date: 2020_3_8
  • ID: 7wtsw1cf_6
    Snippet: The quality of evidence and confidence for the main outcomes (primary outcomes) of including studies in our review will be evaluated and assessed on the basis of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guideline (16) . The quality of evidence will be adjudicated into 4 levels: "very low", "low", "moderate" or "high" All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. the author/funder, who has granted m.....
    Document: The quality of evidence and confidence for the main outcomes (primary outcomes) of including studies in our review will be evaluated and assessed on the basis of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guideline (16) . The quality of evidence will be adjudicated into 4 levels: "very low", "low", "moderate" or "high" All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents