Selected article for: "ejection fraction and free wall"

Author: Meng, Yuanli; Zhu, Shuangshuang; Xie, Yuji; Zhang, Yanting; Qian, Mingzhu; Gao, Lang; Li, Meng; Lin, Yixia; Wu, Wenqian; Wang, Jing; Yang, Yali; Lv, Qing; Zhang, Li; Li, Yuman; Xie, Mingxing
Title: Prognostic Value of Right Ventricular 3D Speckle-Tracking Strain and Ejection Fraction in Patients With HFpEF
  • Cord-id: 2r7njqih
  • Document date: 2021_6_30
  • ID: 2r7njqih
    Snippet: Background: Right ventricular longitudinal strain of free wall (RV FWLS) assessed by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) is recognized as an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the prognostic implications of three-dimensional STE (3D-STE) parameters in patients with HFpEF have not been well-established. The purpose of our study was to determine whether 3D-STE parameters were the more powe
    Document: Background: Right ventricular longitudinal strain of free wall (RV FWLS) assessed by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) is recognized as an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the prognostic implications of three-dimensional STE (3D-STE) parameters in patients with HFpEF have not been well-established. The purpose of our study was to determine whether 3D-STE parameters were the more powerful predictors of poor outcomes in HFpEF patients compared with 2D-STE indices. Methods: Eighty-one consecutive patients with HFpEF were studied by 2D-STE and 3D-STE. RV volumes, ejection fraction (EF) and 3D-RVFWLS were measured by 3D-STE. 2D-RVFWLS was determined by 2D-STE. Patients were followed for the primary end point of heart failure (HF)-related hospitalization and death for HF. Results: After a median follow-up period of 17 months, 39 (48%) patients reached the end point of cardiovascular events. Compared with HFpEF patients without end-point events, those with end-point events had lower RVEF and 3D-RVFWLS (P < 0.05). Separate multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that 3D-RVFWLS (HR 5.73; 95% CI 2.77–11.85; P < 0.001), RVEF (HR 3.47; 95% CI 1.47–8.21; P = 0.005), and 2D-RVFWLS (HR 3.17; 95% CI 1.54–6.53; P = 0.002) were independent predictors of adverse outcomes. The models with 3D-RVFWLS (AIC = 246, C-index = 0.75) and RVEF (AIC = 247, C-index = 0.76) had similar predictive performance for future clinical events as with 2D-RVFWLS (AIC = 248, C-index = 0.74). Conclusions: 3D-STE parameters are powerful predictors of poor outcomes, providing a similar predictive value as 2D-STE indices in patients with HFpEF. These findings support the potential of RV 3D-STE to identify HFpEF patients at higher risk for adverse cardiac events.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • accurate assessment and lv function assessment: 1
    • longitudinal strain and lv diastolic function: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • longitudinal strain and lv dysfunction: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • longitudinal strain and lv function assessment: 1, 2, 3
    • lv diastolic function and lv function assessment: 1, 2, 3
    • lv dysfunction and lv function assessment: 1