Author: Michael L Jackson; Gregory R Hart; Denise J McCulloch; Amanda Adler; Elisabeth Brandstetter; Kairsten Fay; Peter Han; Kirsten Lacombe; Jover Lee; Thomas Sibley; Deborah A Nickerson; Mark Rieder; Lea Starita; Janet A Englund; Trevor Bedford; Helen Chu; Michael Famulare
Title: Effects of weather-related social distancing on city-scale transmission of respiratory viruses Document date: 2020_3_3
ID: ngbfiws5_18
Snippet: is the (which was not peer-reviewed) The copyright holder for this preprint . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.02.20027599 doi: medRxiv preprint Modeling and simulation studies have been used to predict the impact of social distancing on the course of a hypothetical influenza pandemic (e.g. [11] [12] [13] [14] . Although there is heterogeneity in the specific form of social distancing modeled, most of the studies have assumed that social distancin.....
Document: is the (which was not peer-reviewed) The copyright holder for this preprint . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.02.20027599 doi: medRxiv preprint Modeling and simulation studies have been used to predict the impact of social distancing on the course of a hypothetical influenza pandemic (e.g. [11] [12] [13] [14] . Although there is heterogeneity in the specific form of social distancing modeled, most of the studies have assumed that social distancing measures are initiated early in the course of a pandemic. These studies consistently suggest that such social distancing can delay the timing and intensity of the pandemic peak, but with little impact on the final attack rate of the pandemic. Our observations support these findings. The extreme snowfall of February 2019 occurred early in the seasonal epidemics of influenza A/H3N2 and hMPV, and we estimate that the final attack rates of these viruses only decreased by 3% and the peaks only shifted by 18 or 15 days, respectively.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- attack rate and influenza pandemic: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- attack rate and pandemic attack rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
- attack rate and pandemic course: 1
- attack rate and pandemic peak: 1, 2
- attack rate and seasonal epidemic: 1
- attack rate and simulation study: 1, 2, 3, 4
- attack rate and social distancing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- attack rate and social distancing impact: 1, 2, 3, 4
- distancing measure and influenza pandemic: 1
- distancing measure and pandemic course: 1
- distancing measure and pandemic peak: 1
- distancing measure and simulation study: 1
- distancing measure and social distancing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- distancing measure and social distancing impact: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
- extreme snowfall and social distancing: 1
- finding support and influenza pandemic: 1, 2
- finding support and social distancing: 1, 2, 3, 4
- hypothetical influenza pandemic and influenza pandemic: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- influenza pandemic and intensity timing: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date