Author: Santibanez, A.; Luraschi, R.; Barrera-Avalos, C.; Vallejos-Vidal, E.; Alarcon, J.; Cayunao, J.; Mella, A.; Figueroa, M.; Hernandez, F.; Plaza, B.; Inostroza-Molina, A.; Valdes, D.; Imarai, M.; Acuna-Castillo, C.; Reyes-Lopez, F. E.; Sandino, A. M.
Title: THE COMPARISON OF THREE REAL-TIME PCR KITS FOR SARS-COV-2 DIAGNOSIS REVEALS DISCREPANCIES ON THE IDENTIFICATION OF POSITIVE COVID-19 CASES AND DISPERSION ON THE VALUES OBTAINED FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 VARIANTS Cord-id: 23gznvne Document date: 2021_7_16
ID: 23gznvne
Snippet: The COVID-19 pandemic has generated a huge challenge and threat to public health throughout the world population. Reverse transcription associated with real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) has been the gold-standard molecular tool for diagnosis and detection of the SARS-CoV-2. Currently, it is used as the main strategy for testing, traceability, and control of positive cases For this reason, the on-top high demand for reagents has produced stock-out on several occasions and the only alt
Document: The COVID-19 pandemic has generated a huge challenge and threat to public health throughout the world population. Reverse transcription associated with real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) has been the gold-standard molecular tool for diagnosis and detection of the SARS-CoV-2. Currently, it is used as the main strategy for testing, traceability, and control of positive cases For this reason, the on-top high demand for reagents has produced stock-out on several occasions and the only alternative to keep population diagnosis has been the use of different RT-qPCR kits. Therefore, we evaluate the performance of three of the commercial RT-qPCR kits currently in use for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in Chile, consisting in: TaqMan 2019-nCoV Assay Kit v1 (Thermo). Real-Time Fluorescent RT-PCR Kit for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 (BGI), and LightCycler Multiplex RNA Virus Master (Roche). Results of quantification cycle (Cq) and relative fluorescence units (RFU) obtained from their RT-qPCR reactions revealed important discrepancies on the total RNA required for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 genes and diagnosis. Marked differences between kits in samples with 30>Cq value< 34 was observed. Samples with positive diagnoses for Covid-19 using the Thermo Fisher kit had different results when the same samples were evaluated with Roche and BGI kits. The displacement on the Cq value for SARS-CoV-2 identification between the three different RT-qPCR kits was also evident when the presence of single nucleotide variants was evaluated in the context of genomic surveillance. Taken together, this study emphasizes the special care adjusting RT-qPCR reaction conditions of the different kits must be taken by all the laboratories before carrying out the detection of SARS-CoV-2 genes from total RNA nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date