Author: Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Agnar Helgason; Hakon Jonsson; Olafur T Magnusson; Pall Melsted; Gudmundur L Norddahl; Jona Saemundsdottir; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Patrick Sulem; Arna B Agustsdottir; Berglind Eiriksdottir; Run Fridriksdottir; Elisabet E Gardarsdottir; Gudmundur Georgsson; Olafia S Gretarsdottir; Kjartan R Gudmundsson; Thora R Gunnarsdottir; Arnaldur Gylfason; Hilma Holm; Brynjar O Jensson; Aslaug Jonasdottir; Frosti Jonsson; Kamilla S Josefsdottir; Thordur Kristjansson; Droplaug N Magnusdottir; Louise le Roux; Gudrun Sigmundsdottir; Gardar Sveinbjornsson; Kristin E Sveinsdottir; Maney Sveinsdottir; Emil A Thorarensen; Bjarni Thorbjornsson; Arthur Love; Gisli Masson; Ingileif Jonsdottir; Alma Moller; Thorolfur Gudnason; Karl G Kristinsson; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson
Title: Early Spread of SARS-Cov-2 in the Icelandic Population Document date: 2020_3_30
ID: bbmcenpy_35
Snippet: The first SARS-CoV-2 infected individual in Iceland was identified on February 28, having returned from northern Italy before it had been designated a high-risk area by the Icelandic authorities. Less than a month later, March 22 2020, 528 individuals had tested positive for the virus out of 4,551 targeted for testing (11.6%) and 50 out of 5,502 participants of the population screening (0.9%) ( Table 1) Table 1 ). In the early targeted testing 40.....
Document: The first SARS-CoV-2 infected individual in Iceland was identified on February 28, having returned from northern Italy before it had been designated a high-risk area by the Icelandic authorities. Less than a month later, March 22 2020, 528 individuals had tested positive for the virus out of 4,551 targeted for testing (11.6%) and 50 out of 5,502 participants of the population screening (0.9%) ( Table 1) Table 1 ). In the early targeted testing 40.1% of positives reported contact with a known infected individual, compared to 55.6% in the later. Of the positives from the population screening, 34.0% had recently traveled outside of Iceland, which is substantially more than the 13.7% of the negatives (P=0.00025), and only 6% of them reported contact with an infected person. This low number of contacts is most certainly because known contacts of infected persons were in quarantine and were not eligible for the population screening.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- early target and high risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- high risk and infected individual: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
- high risk and infected person: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- high risk and infected person contact: 1, 2, 3, 4
- high risk and later compare: 1
- high risk and low number: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- high risk and population screening: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- high risk and population screening positive: 1
- high risk and positive test: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- high risk and positive testing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- high risk area and infected individual: 1, 2
- high risk area and positive test: 1, 2
- high risk area and positive testing: 1, 2
- infected individual and know infected individual: 1, 2
- infected individual and low number: 1, 2, 3
- infected individual and population screening: 1, 2, 3, 4
- infected individual and positive test: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
- infected individual and positive testing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- infected person and positive test: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date