Author: Shuya Lu; Qi Zhou; Liping Huang; Qianling Shi; Siya Zhao; Zijun Wang; Weiguo Li; Yuyi Tang; Yanfang Ma; Xufei Luo; Toshio Fukuoka; Hyeong Sik Ahn; Myeong Soo Lee; Zhengxiu Luo; Enmei Liu; Yaolong Chen; Chenyan Zhou; Donghong Peng
Title: Effectiveness and Safety of Glucocorticoids to Treat COVID-19: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis Document date: 2020_4_22
ID: 935r7w01_26
Snippet: Two researchers (Zhou Q and Shi Q) assessed the quality of evidence independently using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool (19) (20) . We produced a "Summary of Findings" table using the GRADEpro software. The quality of evidence can be downgraded based on five factors (study limitations, consistency of effect, imprecision, indirectness and publication bias) and upgraded based on three factors (larg.....
Document: Two researchers (Zhou Q and Shi Q) assessed the quality of evidence independently using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool (19) (20) . We produced a "Summary of Findings" table using the GRADEpro software. The quality of evidence can be downgraded based on five factors (study limitations, consistency of effect, imprecision, indirectness and publication bias) and upgraded based on three factors (large magnitude of effect, dose-response relation and plausible confounders or biases) (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) (26) . The quality of evidence of each outcome is then classified as "high", "moderate", "low" or "very low".
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- dose response and outcome evidence quality: 1
- dose response and publication bias: 1, 2, 3, 4
- dose response and publication bias indirectness: 1, 2
- dose response and publication bias indirectness imprecision: 1, 2
- dose response and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect: 1, 2
- dose response and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect consistency: 1, 2
- dose response relation and outcome evidence: 1
- dose response relation and outcome evidence quality: 1
- dose response relation and publication bias: 1, 2
- dose response relation and publication bias indirectness: 1, 2
- dose response relation and publication bias indirectness imprecision: 1, 2
- dose response relation and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect: 1, 2
- dose response relation and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect consistency: 1, 2
- effect large magnitude and outcome evidence quality: 1
- effect large magnitude and publication bias: 1, 2
- effect large magnitude and publication bias indirectness: 1, 2
- effect large magnitude and publication bias indirectness imprecision: 1, 2
- effect large magnitude and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect: 1, 2
- effect large magnitude and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect consistency: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date