Author: Shuya Lu; Qi Zhou; Liping Huang; Qianling Shi; Siya Zhao; Zijun Wang; Weiguo Li; Yuyi Tang; Yanfang Ma; Xufei Luo; Toshio Fukuoka; Hyeong Sik Ahn; Myeong Soo Lee; Zhengxiu Luo; Enmei Liu; Yaolong Chen; Chenyan Zhou; Donghong Peng
Title: Effectiveness and Safety of Glucocorticoids to Treat COVID-19: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis Document date: 2020_4_22
ID: 935r7w01_33
Snippet: The rapid review identified 2509 publications, of which 23 studies (one RCT and 22 cohort studies) (29-51) met our inclusion criteria and were included. The literature screening process is shown in Figure 1 . One study included adult patients with severe MERS, 17 studies included patients with SARS, and the remaining five studies were on patients with COVID-19 (Table 1) . Due to the insufficient representativeness and follow-up time, only three a.....
Document: The rapid review identified 2509 publications, of which 23 studies (one RCT and 22 cohort studies) (29-51) met our inclusion criteria and were included. The literature screening process is shown in Figure 1 . One study included adult patients with severe MERS, 17 studies included patients with SARS, and the remaining five studies were on patients with COVID-19 (Table 1) . Due to the insufficient representativeness and follow-up time, only three articles scored higher than six out of nine points. The methodological quality of included cohort studies was poor. The risk of bias of included RCT was unclear because of unclear risks of selection bias, detection bias and reporting bias ( Table 2, Table 3 ).
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- adult patient and high score: 1
- adult patient and methodological quality: 1
- adult patient and reporting bias: 1, 2
- adult patient and SARS patient: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- adult patient and severe mer: 1
- cohort study and detection bias: 1, 2
- cohort study and follow time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- cohort study and high score: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- cohort study and include cohort study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- cohort study and inclusion criterion: 1
- cohort study and literature screening: 1
- cohort study and methodological quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- cohort study and remain study: 1, 2, 3
- cohort study and reporting bias: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- cohort study and SARS patient: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61
- cohort study and selection bias: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- cohort study and severe mer: 1
- cohort study and unclear risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35
- detection bias and methodological quality: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date