Author: Stute, Nina; Province, Valesha; Augenreich, Marc; Stickford, Jonathon; Ratchford, Stephen; Stickford, Abigail
Title: Longitudinal Tracking of Autonomic and Cardiovascular Function in Individuals Previously Diagnosed with COVIDâ€19 Cord-id: 6zn3nzji Document date: 2021_5_14
ID: 6zn3nzji
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Individuals infected with the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSâ€CoVâ€2) exhibit a wide variety of symptoms, indicating potential systemic effects of the virus. Anecdotally, many patients †even those who experience only mild cases initially †continue to suffer from symptoms months after diagnosis, including indicators of potential autonomic dysfunction like tachycardia upon standing. However, the longâ€term impact of and recovery from COVIDâ€19 on
Document: BACKGROUND: Individuals infected with the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSâ€CoVâ€2) exhibit a wide variety of symptoms, indicating potential systemic effects of the virus. Anecdotally, many patients †even those who experience only mild cases initially †continue to suffer from symptoms months after diagnosis, including indicators of potential autonomic dysfunction like tachycardia upon standing. However, the longâ€term impact of and recovery from COVIDâ€19 on autonomic and cardiovascular function in otherwise healthy individuals remains largely unclear. METHODS: Otherwise healthy young adults (n=11, 6F) who had tested positive for SARSâ€CoVâ€2 came to the laboratory two times: Visit 1 (V1) was 3â€4 weeks postâ€diagnosis, and Visit 2 (V2) was one month later. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; n=2) via microneurography, beat by beat systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) arterial blood pressure via finger photoplethysmography, and heart rate (HR) were continuously measured in subjects at rest, during a 2â€min cold pressor test (CPT), and during 5 min each at 30° and 60° head up tilt (HUT; no MSNA). Paired sample tâ€tests and twoâ€way ANOVA were used to determine differences in the cardiovascular outcome measures between visits. RESULTS: Resting SBP (123 ± 18 vs. 119 ± 17 mmHg), DBP (73 ± 16 vs. 69 ± 7 mmHg), and HR (63 ± 10 vs. 62 ± 9 bpm) did not change from V1 to V2. Preliminary data (n=2) indicates MSNA may decrease from V1 to V2 (14.5 ± 4 vs. 9 ± 3 bursts·minâ€1), but the study is currently not powered to examine statistical significance. During the 2â€minute CPT protocol, SBP (150 ± 10 vs. 145 ± 13 mmHg, p=0.08), DBP (94 ± 12 vs. 88 ± 12 mmHg, p=0.10), and HR (77 ± 19 vs. 71 ± 11 bpm, p=0.11) tended to be the same or lower from V1 to V2. Likewise, individual data from two subjects suggests MSNA reactivity during a painful stimulus (CPT) may decrease from V1 to V2 (16 ± 4 vs 10 ± 3 bursts·minâ€1). These two subjects also exhibited reduced MSNA during the threeâ€minute CPT recovery period from V1 to V2 (14 ± 2 vs. 7 ± 1 bursts·minâ€1). During both 30° and 60° HUT, SBP, DBP, and HR responses were similar between V1 and V2. CONCLUSION: Young, otherwise healthy individuals infected with SARSâ€CoVâ€2 may have exaggerated sympathetic neural and cardiovascular responses to physiological stress 3â€4 weeks postâ€positive test date. However, preliminary data indicates that sympathetic and cardiovascular reactivity to painful stimuli is reduced from one†to twoâ€months postâ€diagnosis. Continued monitoring of autonomic and cardiovascular function is warranted to determine the longâ€term consequences of contracting SARSâ€CoVâ€2.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date