Author: Vimercati, Luigi; Stefanizzi, Pasquale; De Maria, Luigi; Caputi, Antonio; Cavone, Domenica; Quarato, Marco; Gesualdo, Loreto; Lopalco, Pier Luigi; Migliore, Giovanni; Sponselli, Stefania; Graziano, Giusi; Vittoria Larocca, Angela Maria; Tafuri, Silvio
Title: Large-scale IgM and IgG SARS-CoV-2 serological screening among healthcare workers with a low infection prevalence based on nasopharyngeal swab tests in an Italian university hospital: perspectives for public health Cord-id: 1sria1gh Document date: 2021_1_27
ID: 1sria1gh
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are highly exposed to SARS-CoV-2infection given their specific tasks. The IgG-IgM serological assay has demonstrated good accuracy in early detection in symptomatic patients, but its role in the diagnosis of asymptomatic patients is uncertain. The aim of our study was to assess IgM and IgG prevalence in sera in a large cohort of HCWs previously subjected to Nasopharyngeal swab test (NST) after accurate risk assessment due to positive COVID-19 patient exposur
Document: BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are highly exposed to SARS-CoV-2infection given their specific tasks. The IgG-IgM serological assay has demonstrated good accuracy in early detection in symptomatic patients, but its role in the diagnosis of asymptomatic patients is uncertain. The aim of our study was to assess IgM and IgG prevalence in sera in a large cohort of HCWs previously subjected to Nasopharyngeal swab test (NST) after accurate risk assessment due to positive COVID-19 patient exposure during an observation period of 90 days. METHODS: 2407 asymptomatic HCWs that had close contact with COVID-19 patients in the period between April 8th and June 7(th) were screened with NST based on the RT-PCR method. In parallel, they underwent large-scale chemiluminescence immunoassays involving IgM-IgG serological screening to determine actual viral spread in the same cohort. RESULTS: During the 90-day observation period, 18 workers (0.75%) resulted positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection at the NST, whereas the positivity rates for IgM and IgG were 11.51% and 2.37%, respectively (277 workers). Despite high specificity, serological tests were inadequate for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with previous positive NST results (IgM and IgG sensitivities of 27.78% and 50.00%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate a widespread low viral load of SARS-CoV-2 among hospital workers. However, serological screening showed very low sensitivity with respect to NST in identifying infected workers, and negative IgG and IgM results should not exclude the diagnosis of COVID-19. IgG-IgM chemiluminescence immunoassays could increase the diagnosis of COVID-19 only in association with NST, and this association is considered helpful for decision-making regarding returning to work.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abbott system and acute infection detect: 1
- abbott system and acute infection detect ability: 1
- abbott test and acute infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- abbott test and acute infection detect: 1
- abbott test and acute infection detect ability: 1
- abbott test and low accuracy: 1
- abbott test and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- accurate risk assessment and low sensitivity: 1
- acute infection and low accuracy: 1, 2, 3, 4
- acute infection and low medium: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- acute infection and low medium high: 1, 2, 3
- acute infection and low positive predictive value: 1
- acute infection and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
- longitudinal profile and low medium: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date