Selected article for: "dose response and evidence quality"
Author: Jianjian Wang; Yuyi Tang; Yanfang Ma; Qi Zhou; Weiguo Li; Muna Baskota; Yinmei Yang; Xingmei Wang; Qingyuan Li; Xufei Luo; Toshio Fukuoka; Hyeong Sik Ahn; Myeong Soo Lee; Zhengxiu Luo; Enmei Liu; Yaolong Chen
Title: Efficacy and Safety of Antibiotic Agents in Children with COVID-19: A Rapid Review
  • Document date: 2020_4_17
    • ID: jubwcobb_28
    Snippet: Two reviewers (Jianjian Wang and Yuyi Tang) assessed the quality of evidence independently by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. In the GRADE approach, direct evidence from RCTs begins at high quality, and evidence from observational studies at low level. The quality can be downgraded for five reasons (study limitations, consistency of effect, imprecision, indirectness, and publication bi.....
    Document: Two reviewers (Jianjian Wang and Yuyi Tang) assessed the quality of evidence independently by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. In the GRADE approach, direct evidence from RCTs begins at high quality, and evidence from observational studies at low level. The quality can be downgraded for five reasons (study limitations, consistency of effect, imprecision, indirectness, and publication bias) and upgraded for three reasons (large magnitude of effect, dose-response relation, and plausible confounders or biases) (26) (27) (28) (29) (30) (31) . In order to reflect the extent of our confidence that the estimates of the effect are correct, the quality of evidence will be graded as high, moderate, low, or very low. We produced a "Summary of Findings" table, which presented the overall quality of a body of evidence for each outcome, by using the GRADEpro software (32, 33) . We did not assess the quality of evidence of the case series and case reports on the use of antibiotics and bacterial coinfections in patients with COVID-19.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • direct evidence and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect: 1
    • direct evidence and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect consistency: 1
    • dose response and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect: 1, 2
    • dose response and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect consistency: 1, 2
    • dose response relation and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect: 1, 2
    • dose response relation and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect consistency: 1, 2
    • effect estimate and study limitation: 1, 2
    • effect large magnitude and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect: 1, 2
    • effect large magnitude and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect consistency: 1, 2
    • evidence body and study limitation: 1
    • evidence quality and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect: 1, 2, 3
    • evidence quality and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect consistency: 1, 2
    • evidence quality and study limitation: 1
    • evidence quality assess and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect: 1
    • Findings Summary table and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect: 1, 2
    • Findings Summary table and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect consistency: 1, 2
    • gradepro software and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect consistency: 1
    • high quality and publication bias indirectness imprecision effect consistency: 1, 2
    • high quality and study limitation: 1, 2