Selected article for: "dose response and high level"
Author: Jianjian Wang; Yuyi Tang; Yanfang Ma; Qi Zhou; Weiguo Li; Muna Baskota; Yinmei Yang; Xingmei Wang; Qingyuan Li; Xufei Luo; Toshio Fukuoka; Hyeong Sik Ahn; Myeong Soo Lee; Zhengxiu Luo; Enmei Liu; Yaolong Chen
Title: Efficacy and Safety of Antibiotic Agents in Children with COVID-19: A Rapid Review
  • Document date: 2020_4_17
    • ID: jubwcobb_28
    Snippet: Two reviewers (Jianjian Wang and Yuyi Tang) assessed the quality of evidence independently by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. In the GRADE approach, direct evidence from RCTs begins at high quality, and evidence from observational studies at low level. The quality can be downgraded for five reasons (study limitations, consistency of effect, imprecision, indirectness, and publication bi.....
    Document: Two reviewers (Jianjian Wang and Yuyi Tang) assessed the quality of evidence independently by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. In the GRADE approach, direct evidence from RCTs begins at high quality, and evidence from observational studies at low level. The quality can be downgraded for five reasons (study limitations, consistency of effect, imprecision, indirectness, and publication bias) and upgraded for three reasons (large magnitude of effect, dose-response relation, and plausible confounders or biases) (26) (27) (28) (29) (30) (31) . In order to reflect the extent of our confidence that the estimates of the effect are correct, the quality of evidence will be graded as high, moderate, low, or very low. We produced a "Summary of Findings" table, which presented the overall quality of a body of evidence for each outcome, by using the GRADEpro software (32, 33) . We did not assess the quality of evidence of the case series and case reports on the use of antibiotics and bacterial coinfections in patients with COVID-19.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • bacterial coinfection and dose response: 1
    • bacterial coinfection antibiotic and case series: 1
    • case case series and direct evidence: 1, 2
    • case case series and dose response: 1
    • case case series and Evaluation Development Recommendations Assessment grade approach: 1, 2
    • case case series and evidence body: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • case case series evidence and evidence body: 1
    • case case series evidence quality and evidence body: 1
    • case series and direct evidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • case series and dose response: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • case series and effect estimate: 1, 2, 3
    • case series and Evaluation Development Recommendations Assessment grade approach: 1, 2, 3
    • case series and evidence body: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • case series and evidence body overall quality: 1
    • direct evidence and dose response: 1, 2, 3
    • direct evidence and dose response relation: 1
    • direct evidence and effect large magnitude: 1
    • direct evidence and Evaluation Development Recommendations Assessment grade approach: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • direct evidence and evidence body: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6