Author: Krischek, O; Miloslavski, E; Fischer, S; Shrivastava, S; Henkes, H
Title: A comparison of functional and physical properties of self-expanding intracranial stents [Neuroform3, Wingspan, Solitaire, Leo+, Enterprise]. Cord-id: 3a6kq8qs Document date: 2011_1_1
ID: 3a6kq8qs
Snippet: PURPOSE 5 self-expanding intracranial stents Neuroform (N), Wingspan (W), Solitaire (S), Leo(+) (L), and Enterprise (E) were subjected to an in vitro examination and comparison of their physical features and functional properties in order to better understand the clinical advantages and potential limitations of each device. MATERIAL AND METHODS The following features were examined for each stent: visual appearance, radial strength, wall apposition, bending stiffness, gator backing, kink resistan
Document: PURPOSE 5 self-expanding intracranial stents Neuroform (N), Wingspan (W), Solitaire (S), Leo(+) (L), and Enterprise (E) were subjected to an in vitro examination and comparison of their physical features and functional properties in order to better understand the clinical advantages and potential limitations of each device. MATERIAL AND METHODS The following features were examined for each stent: visual appearance, radial strength, wall apposition, bending stiffness, gator backing, kink resistance, ovalization, vessel wall coverage, cell size, ease of delivery. RESULTS Given are rankings for the 5 stents: radial force at 50% oversizing: L
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date