Author: Barzilay, Ran; Moore, Tyler M.; Greenberg, David M.; DiDomenico, Grace E.; Brown, Lily A.; White, Lauren K.; Gur, Ruben C.; Gur, Raquel E.
Title: Resilience, COVID-19-related stress, anxiety and depression during the pandemic in a large population enriched for healthcare providers Cord-id: 3a3ngzvo Document date: 2020_8_20
ID: 3a3ngzvo
Snippet: COVID-19 pandemic is a global calamity posing an unprecedented opportunity to study resilience. We developed a brief resilience survey probing self-reliance, emotion-regulation, interpersonal-relationship patterns and neighborhood-environment, and applied it online during the acute COVID-19 outbreak (April 6–15, 2020), on a crowdsourcing research website (www.covid19resilience.org) advertised through social media. We evaluated level of stress (worries) regarding COVID-19: (1) contracting, (2)
Document: COVID-19 pandemic is a global calamity posing an unprecedented opportunity to study resilience. We developed a brief resilience survey probing self-reliance, emotion-regulation, interpersonal-relationship patterns and neighborhood-environment, and applied it online during the acute COVID-19 outbreak (April 6–15, 2020), on a crowdsourcing research website (www.covid19resilience.org) advertised through social media. We evaluated level of stress (worries) regarding COVID-19: (1) contracting, (2) dying from, (3) currently having, (4) family member contracting, (5) unknowingly infecting others with (6) experiencing significant financial burden following. Anxiety (GAD7) and depression (PHQ2) were measured. Totally, 3042 participants (n = 1964 females, age range 18–79, mean age = 39) completed the resilience and COVID-19-related stress survey and 1350 of them (mean age = 41, SD = 13; n = 997 females) completed GAD7 and PHQ2. Participants significantly endorsed more distress about family contracting COVID-19 (48.5%) and unknowingly infecting others (36%), than getting COVID-19 themselves (19.9%), p < 0.0005 covarying for demographics and proxy COVID-19 exposures like getting tested and knowing infected individuals. Patterns of COVID-19 related worries, rates of anxiety (GAD7 > 10, 22.2%) and depression (PHQ2 > 2, 16.1%) did not differ between healthcare providers and non-healthcare providers. Higher resilience scores were associated with lower COVID-19 related worries (main effect F(1,3054) = 134.9; p < 0.00001, covarying for confounders). Increase in 1 SD on resilience score was associated with reduced rate of anxiety (65%) and depression (69%), across healthcare and non-healthcare professionals. Findings provide empirical evidence on mental health associated with COVID-19 outbreak in a large convenience sample, setting a stage for longitudinal studies evaluating mental health trajectories following COVID-19 pandemic.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acute outbreak and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute outbreak and longitudinal study: 1, 2, 3
- acute phase and logistic model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- acute phase and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute phase and longitudinal study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- acute phase and low likelihood: 1
- acute situation and logistic model: 1
- acute stress and local factor: 1
- acute stress and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute stress and longitudinal study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- local factor and logistic model: 1
- local factor and logistic regression: 1, 2
- logistic model and longitudinal study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- logistic model and low likelihood: 1, 2
- logistic regression and longitudinal study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- logistic regression and low likelihood: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date