Selected article for: "face face contact and total number"

Author: Afshar, Rowshanak; Tang, Tricia S; Askari, Amir S; Sidhu, Rawel; Brown, Helen; Sherifali, Diana
Title: Peer Support Interventions in Type 2 Diabetes: Review of Components and Process Outcomes.
  • Cord-id: 70oi7orl
  • Document date: 2019_1_1
  • ID: 70oi7orl
    Snippet: BACKGROUND This review seeks to identify: (1) the various components and process outcomes of type 2 diabetes peer support (PS) interventions; and (2) the measures implemented to monitor intervention fidelity and evaluate outcomes in these studies. METHODS The Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases were searched from inception to May 2019. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data from eligible articles via the Template for Intervention Description and Repl
    Document: BACKGROUND This review seeks to identify: (1) the various components and process outcomes of type 2 diabetes peer support (PS) interventions; and (2) the measures implemented to monitor intervention fidelity and evaluate outcomes in these studies. METHODS The Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases were searched from inception to May 2019. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data from eligible articles via the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist (why, what, who provided, how, where, when and how much, tailoring, modifications, and how well). RESULTS Twenty-three trials were included. The total number of participants was 7178. Most interventions were in primary care. Although face-to-face was the most common modality of contact, rates of contact were highest for telephone. Potential PLs were identified primarily through recommendations from health professionals, based on their communication skills, HbA1c, and coaching interest. PLs were mostly female, university educated, and had a long history of diabetes (≥ 10 years). PL training varied significantly in length and content; the two most frequent topics were communication skills and diabetes knowledge. Although several studies implemented methods to evaluate "intervention fidelity," only few rigorously assessed the two key components of fidelity,"adherence" and "competence," through audio-, video-taping or direct observations. CONCLUSIONS The impact of PS on participants' health outcomes is well-investigated; however, the implementation, and evaluation strategies vary significantly across these studies. In the present review, we defined the various components of PS interventions and proposed suggestions for enhancing the implementation and evaluation of future PS models. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Try single phrases listed below for: 1
    Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date