Selected article for: "assay result and positive result"

Author: Kittel, M.; Muth, M.; Zahn, I.; Roth, P.; Thiaucourt, M.; Gerhards, C.; Haselmann, V.; Neumaier, M.; Findeisen, P.
Title: Clinical evaluation of commercial automated SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays
  • Cord-id: 6h5l3ycr
  • Document date: 2020_12_9
  • ID: 6h5l3ycr
    Snippet: OBJECTIVE: Numerous immunoassays for detecting antibodies directed against SARS-CoV-2 have rapidly been developed and released. Validations of these have been performed with a limited number of samples. The lack of standardization might lead to significantly different results. This study compares ten automated assays from six vendors in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility. METHODS: This study compared ten fully automated IAs from the following vendors: Diasorin, Epitope Diagno
    Document: OBJECTIVE: Numerous immunoassays for detecting antibodies directed against SARS-CoV-2 have rapidly been developed and released. Validations of these have been performed with a limited number of samples. The lack of standardization might lead to significantly different results. This study compares ten automated assays from six vendors in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility. METHODS: This study compared ten fully automated IAs from the following vendors: Diasorin, Epitope Diagnostics, Euroimmun, Roche, YHLO, and Snibe. The retrospective part of the study included patients with a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection and controls comprised patients with a suspected infection, in whom the disease was excluded. Furthermore, biobanked sera were taken as negative controls (n = 97). The retrospective part involved four classes: 1) laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection (n = 183); 1B) suspected COVID-19 infection (n = 167) without qRT-PCR result but positive serological results from at least two different assays, and suspected COVID-19 infection due to a positive serological result from the Roche assay (n = 295); 2) biobanked sera obtained from patients before the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 (n = 97) as negative controls. 2A) probably COVID-19-negative sera with negative serological results from at least two different assays (n = 152). RESULTS: Overall diagnostic sensitivities were: Euroimmun(IgA) 87%; Epitope Diagnostics(IgG) 83%; YHLO(IgG) 77%; Roche(IgM/IgG) 77%; Euroimmun(IgG) 75%; Diasorin(IgG) 53%; Epitope Diagnostics(IgM) 52%; Snibe(IgG) 47%; YHLO(IgM) 35%; Snibe(IgM) 26%. Diagnostic specificities were: YHLO(IgG) 100%; Roche, 100%; Snibe(IgM/IgG) 100%; Diasorin(IgG) 97%; Euroimmun(IgG), 94%; YHLO(IgM) 94%; Euroimmun(IgA) 83%. CONCLUSION: Assays from different vendors vary substantially in terms of their performance. Our findings might facilitate the selection of appropriate serological assays.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • accurate rapid and acute sars infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • accurate rapid and acute sars infection diagnose: 1, 2
    • accurate rapid and lod detection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
    • accurate rapid and lod detection limit: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • accurate rapid and loq quantification: 1, 2, 3
    • accurate rapid and low performance: 1
    • accurate rapid diagnosis and acid detection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • accurate rapid diagnosis and acute sars infection: 1, 2
    • accurate rapid diagnosis and lod detection: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • accurate rapid diagnosis and lod detection limit: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • ace receptor and acute sars infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acid detection and acute sars infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • acid detection and lod detection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
    • acid detection and lod detection limit: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • acid detection and lod detection limit linearity: 1
    • acid detection and low performance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • acute sars infection and lod detection: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute sars infection and lod detection limit: 1, 2, 3
    • acute sars infection and lod detection limit linearity: 1