Selected article for: "accuracy speed and additional result"

Author: Gardiner, B.J.; Parker, C.E.V.; Rabson, A.R.; Snydman, D.R.; Doron, S.
Title: Evaluation of a two-stage testing algorithm for the diagnosis of respiratory viral infections
  • Cord-id: 7paar9wg
  • Document date: 2018_3_12
  • ID: 7paar9wg
    Snippet: New on-demand multiplex molecular respiratory viral diagnostics offer superior performance although can be expensive and some platforms cannot process multiple specimens simultaneously. We performed a retrospective study reviewing results of patients tested for respiratory viruses following introduction of a two-stage testing algorithm incorporating an initial screen with Sofia® immunoassay then secondary Biofire Filmarray®, and compared to a period when only Filmarray® was used. Of 2976 test
    Document: New on-demand multiplex molecular respiratory viral diagnostics offer superior performance although can be expensive and some platforms cannot process multiple specimens simultaneously. We performed a retrospective study reviewing results of patients tested for respiratory viruses following introduction of a two-stage testing algorithm incorporating an initial screen with Sofia® immunoassay then secondary Biofire Filmarray®, and compared to a period when only Filmarray® was used. Of 2976 testing episodes, 1814 underwent initial Sofia® then follow-up FilmArray®. A diagnosis of influenza was made by Sofia® in 282 patients, and by FilmArray® in an additional 163 (median time to result 1.12 hours versus 3.46 hours, P < 0.001). Significantly more patients received their diagnosis within 90 minutes in winter despite testing more samples (11.1% versus 3.4%, P < 0.001), and approximately $36,000 was saved. An algorithmic approach to respiratory viral diagnosis can combine the advantages of accuracy and speed and be cost saving.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • accurate fast and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • accurate rapid and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • accurate rapid and low influenza: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • accurate rapid and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • accurate rapid detection and low influenza: 1
    • accurate rapid detection and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • additional cost and local epidemiology: 1
    • additional cost and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
    • local epidemiology and low sensitivity: 1
    • log rank test compare and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • logistic regression and low influenza: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17