Author: Malanchini, G.; Ferrari, P.; Leidi, C.; Ferrari, G.; Racheli, M.; Senni, M.; De Filippo, P.
Title: Ventricular arrhythmias among patients with implantable cardioverterâ€defibrillator during the COVIDâ€19 pandemic Cord-id: fj4kl4au Document date: 2021_2_16
ID: fj4kl4au
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Coronavirus Diseaseâ€2019 (COVIDâ€19) has been associated with myocardial injury and higher risk of arrhythmic complications. However, no reports are available about the effect of the ongoing pandemic on arrhythmias in patients at risk. OBJECTIVE: To describe the effect of COVIDâ€19 pandemic on arrhythmic burden among highâ€risk patients. METHODS: This is a crossâ€sectional study on the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) during the pandemic outbreak (study period), compare
Document: BACKGROUND: Coronavirus Diseaseâ€2019 (COVIDâ€19) has been associated with myocardial injury and higher risk of arrhythmic complications. However, no reports are available about the effect of the ongoing pandemic on arrhythmias in patients at risk. OBJECTIVE: To describe the effect of COVIDâ€19 pandemic on arrhythmic burden among highâ€risk patients. METHODS: This is a crossâ€sectional study on the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) during the pandemic outbreak (study period), compared to the same timeframe in 2019 (reference period). Inclusion criteria were age (>18 years) and having an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD). RESULTS: Among 455 patients enrolled (mean age 64.9 ± 15.7 years; 25.1% females and 39.6% with CRTD), in the study period, 45 (9.9%) patients experienced a total of 86 VA; 8 patients (1.7%) required antitachycardiaâ€pacing (ATP) and 6 (1.3%) at least one shock. In the reference period, a total of 69 events occurred in 36 patients (7.9%). Six patients (1.3%) required ATP and three (0.7%) at least one shock. The number of patients that suffered from any arrhythmic events in the study period (9.9% vs 7.9%) did not significantly differ from the reference period (χ(2) = 1.09, P = .29). The main predictor of VA during the COVIDâ€19 pandemic was the previous history of any ICD therapy (OR = 3.84, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: No evidence of an increase of arrhythmic burden was found during the COVIDâ€19 pandemic among patients with an ICD.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absence presence and activity period: 1, 2, 3
- absence presence and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63
- absence presence and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- activity level and acute coronary syndrome: 1, 2, 3
- activity level and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
- activity level and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- activity period and acute coronary syndrome: 1
- activity period and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- activity period and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3
- actual incidence and logistic regression: 1
- acute coronary syndrome and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- acute coronary syndrome and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date