Hepatocellular carcinoma abutting large vessels: comparison of four percutaneous ablation systems.

Loriaud, Amélie; Denys, Alban; Seror, Olivier; Vietti Violi, Naik; Digklia, Antonia; Duran, Rafael; Trillaud, Hervé; Hocquelet, Arnaud

PURPOSE To compare overall local tumour progression (OLTP), defined as the failure of primary ablation or local tumour progression, with single applicator monopolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), cluster-RFA and multi-bipolar radiofrequency (mbpRFA) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤ 5 cm abutting large vessels (≥3 mm). MATERIALS AND METHODS This multicenter, retrospective, per-nodule study was performed from 2007 to 2015. The study was approved by the ethics review board, and informed consent was waived. A total of 160/914 HCC nodules treated by thermal ablation and abutting large vessels (40 per treatment group) treated by monopolar RFA, MWA, cluster-RFA or mbpRFA were matched for tumour size, alpha-feto-protein level and vessel size. OLTP rates were compared by the log-rank test and the multivariate Cox model after matching. RESULTS No differences were observed in tumour size, vessel size or alpha-feto-protein levels among the three groups (p = 1). The cumulative 4-year OLTP rates following monopolar RFA, cluster-RFA, multi-bipolar RFA and MWA were 50.5%, 16.3%, 16.3% and 44.2%, respectively (p = 0.036). On multivariate Cox regression, vessel size ≥10 mm, monopolar RFA and MWA were independent risk factors of OLTP compared to cluster-RFA or mbpRFA. CONCLUSION Multi-applicator RFA provides better local tumour control in HCC abutting large vessels than single-applicator techniques (monopolar RFA or MWA).