Author: Valdivia, Arantxa; Torres, Ignacio; Latorre, VÃctor; Francésâ€Gómez, Clara; Ferrer, Josep; Forqué, Lorena; Costa, Rosa; de la Asunción, Carlos Solano; Huntley, Dixie; Gozalboâ€Rovira, Roberto; Buesa, Javier; Giménez, Estela; RodrÃguezâ€DÃaz, Jesús; Geller, Ron; Navarro, David
Title: Suitability of two rapid lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for predicting SARSâ€CoVâ€2 neutralizing activity of sera Cord-id: v6rc4bmu Document date: 2020_12_17
ID: v6rc4bmu
Snippet: Assessment of commercial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSâ€CoVâ€2) immunoassays for their capacity to provide reliable information on sera neutralizing activity is an emerging need. We evaluated the performance of two commercially available lateral flow immunochromatographic assays (LFIC; Wondfo SARSâ€CoVâ€2 Antibody test and the INNOVITA 2019â€nCoV Ab test) in comparison with a SARSâ€CoVâ€2 neutralization pseudotyped assay for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19) di
Document: Assessment of commercial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSâ€CoVâ€2) immunoassays for their capacity to provide reliable information on sera neutralizing activity is an emerging need. We evaluated the performance of two commercially available lateral flow immunochromatographic assays (LFIC; Wondfo SARSâ€CoVâ€2 Antibody test and the INNOVITA 2019â€nCoV Ab test) in comparison with a SARSâ€CoVâ€2 neutralization pseudotyped assay for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19) diagnosis in hospitalized patients and investigate whether the intensity of the test band in LFIC associates with neutralizing antibody (NtAb) titers. Ninety sera were included from 51 patients with moderate to severe COVIDâ€19. A green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporterâ€based pseudotyped neutralization assay (vesicular stomatitis virus coated with SARSâ€CoVâ€2 spike protein) was used. Test line intensity was scored using a 4â€level scale (0 to 3+). The overall sensitivity of LFIC assays was 91.1% for the Wondfo SARSâ€CoVâ€2 Antibody test, 72.2% for the INNOVITA 2019â€nCoV IgG, 85.6% for the INNOVITA 2019â€nCoV IgM, and 92.2% for the NtAb assay. Sensitivity increased for all assays in sera collected beyond day 14 after symptoms onset (93.9%, 79.6%, 93.9%, and 93.9%, respectively). Reactivities equal to or more intense than the positive control line (≥2+) in the Wondfo assay had a negative predictive value of 100% and a positive predictive value of 96.4% for high NtAb(50) titers (≥1/160). Our findings support the use of LFIC assays evaluated herein, particularly the Wondfo test, for COVIDâ€19 diagnosis. We also find evidence that these rapid immunoassays can be used to predict high SARSâ€CoVâ€2â€S NtAb(50) titers.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date