Selected article for: "randomized trial and time increase"

Author: Rosario, Barbara H.; Shafi, Humaira; Yii, Anthony C. A.; Tee, Louis Y.; Ang, Arron S. H.; Png, Gek Kheng; Ang, Wendy S. T.; Lee, Yan Qing; Tan, Pei Ting; Sahu, Aniruddha; Zhou, Lin Fang; Zheng, Yi Ling; Slamat, Roslinda Binte; Taha, Aza A. M.
Title: Evaluation of multi-component interventions for prevention of nosocomial pneumonia in older adults: a randomized, controlled trial
  • Cord-id: vsqoz3po
  • Document date: 2021_6_3
  • ID: vsqoz3po
    Snippet: AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of multi-component interventions for prevention of hospital-acquired pneumonia in older patients hospitalized in geriatric wards. METHODS: A randomized, parallel-group, controlled trial was undertaken in patients aged 65 and above who were admitted to a tertiary hospital geriatric unit from January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2018 for an acute non-respiratory illness. Participants were randomized by to receive either a multi-component intervention (consisting of reverse Tr
    Document: AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of multi-component interventions for prevention of hospital-acquired pneumonia in older patients hospitalized in geriatric wards. METHODS: A randomized, parallel-group, controlled trial was undertaken in patients aged 65 and above who were admitted to a tertiary hospital geriatric unit from January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2018 for an acute non-respiratory illness. Participants were randomized by to receive either a multi-component intervention (consisting of reverse Trendelenburg position, dysphagia screening, oral care and vaccinations), or usual care. The outcome measures were the proportion of patients who developed hospital-acquired pneumonia during hospitalisation, and mean time from randomization to the next hospitalisation due to respiratory infections in 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 123 participants (median age, 85; 43.1% male) were randomized, (n = 59) to intervention group and (n = 64) to control group. The multi-component interventions did not significantly reduce the incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia but did increase the mean time to next hospitalisation due to respiratory infection (11.5 months vs. 9.5 months; P = 0.049), and reduced the risk of hospitalisation in 1 year (18.6% vs. 34.4%; P = 0.049). Implementation of multi-component interventions increased diagnoses of oropharyngeal dysphagia (35.6% vs. 20.3%; P < 0.001) and improved the influenza (54.5% vs 17.2%; P < 0.001) and pneumococcal vaccination rates (52.5% vs. 20.3%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The nosocomial pneumonia multi-component intervention did not significantly reduce the incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia during hospitalisation but reduce subsequent hospitalisations for respiratory infections. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT04347395.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abdominal pressure and admission analysis: 1
    • acute hospital admission and admission analysis: 1
    • acute hospital admission and admission prior: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory infection and adherence rate: 1
    • acute respiratory infection and admission analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • acute respiratory infection and admission influenza vaccine: 1
    • acute respiratory infection and admission prior: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11