Selected article for: "end point and log rank test"

Author: Lauriola, Marinella; Pani, Arianna; Ippoliti, Giovanbattista; Mortara, Andrea; Milighetti, Stefano; Mazen, Marjieh; Perseghin, Gianluca; Pastori, Daniele; Grosso, Paolo; Scaglione, Francesco
Title: Effect of Combination Therapy of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin on Mortality in Patients With COVID‐19
  • Cord-id: ucysxk5c
  • Document date: 2020_10_13
  • ID: ucysxk5c
    Snippet: Conflicting evidence regarding the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin for the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection do exist. We performed a retrospective single‐center cohort study including 377 consecutive patients admitted for pneumonia related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Of these, 297 were in combination treatment, 17 were on HCQ alone, and 63 did not receive either of these 2 drugs because of contraindications.
    Document: Conflicting evidence regarding the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin for the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection do exist. We performed a retrospective single‐center cohort study including 377 consecutive patients admitted for pneumonia related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Of these, 297 were in combination treatment, 17 were on HCQ alone, and 63 did not receive either of these 2 drugs because of contraindications. The primary end point was in‐hospital death. Mean age was 71.8 ± 13.4 years and 34.2% were women. We recorded 146 deaths: 35 in no treatment, 7 in HCQ treatment group, and 102 in HCQ + azithromycin treatment group (log rank test for Kaplan–Meier curve P < 0.001). At multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, age (hazard ratio (HR) 1.057, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.035–1.079, P < 0.001), mechanical ventilation/continuous positive airway pressure (HR 2.726, 95% CI 1.823–4.074, P < 0.001), and C reactive protein above the median (HR 2.191, 95% CI 1.479–3.246, P < 0.001) were directly associated with death, whereas use of HCQ + azithromycin (vs. no treatment; HR 0.265, 95% CI 0.171–0.412, P < 0.001) was inversely associated. In this study, we found a reduced in‐hospital mortality in patients treated with a combination of HCQ and azithromycin after adjustment for comorbidities. A large randomized trial is necessary to confirm these findings.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and log rank test compare: 1
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and lopinavir ritonavir treatment: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and low income country: 1
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and low mortality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and low mortality rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and low respiratory tract: 1, 2
    • loading dose and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • loading dose and lopinavir ritonavir treatment: 1
    • loading dose and low income: 1
    • loading dose and low mortality: 1
    • loading dose and low mortality rate: 1
    • log rank test compare and low mortality: 1
    • log rank test compare and low mortality rate: 1
    • long qt syndrome and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • long qt syndrome and lopinavir ritonavir treatment: 1
    • lopinavir ritonavir and low respiratory tract: 1