Author: Kapoor, Priyanka; Chowdhry, Aman; Kharbanda, Om Prakash; Bablani Popli, Deepika; Gautam, Kamini; Saini, Vikram
Title: Exploring salivary diagnostics in COVID-19: a scoping review and research suggestions Cord-id: dlvw4eo2 Document date: 2021_1_26
ID: dlvw4eo2
Snippet: INTRODUCTION: Molecular diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 infection characteristically involves the sampling of the throat or nasopharyngeal swab (NPS). However, these procedures are invasive, require necessary skills for sample collection, cause patient discomfort, and are non-conducive for extensive scale testing. Saliva is increasingly being suggested as an alternate diagnostic sample in SARSâ€CoVâ€2 infection. OBJECTIVES: This scoping review was done with the objective of exploring the evidence o
Document: INTRODUCTION: Molecular diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 infection characteristically involves the sampling of the throat or nasopharyngeal swab (NPS). However, these procedures are invasive, require necessary skills for sample collection, cause patient discomfort, and are non-conducive for extensive scale testing. Saliva is increasingly being suggested as an alternate diagnostic sample in SARSâ€CoVâ€2 infection. OBJECTIVES: This scoping review was done with the objective of exploring the evidence on the role of saliva as an alternate diagnostic sample in SARSâ€CoVâ€2 condition. METHODS: Thorough search of the literature in major databases was undertaken in June 2020 using free text and MESH terms, followed by PRISMA to identify 17 studies for data extraction. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Evidence was summarised for study characteristics, salivary sampling characteristics, viral load, and longevity of virus in saliva. The literature supports that saliva offers a simple sample collection method compared to technique-sensitive NPS and has the advantage of point-of-care testing for initial screening in community or hospital-based set-up. The additional highlights of this review are heterogeneity in the current literature and the gaps in methodology. Therefore, a robust study design to generate higher levels of evidence has been proposed.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- active virus and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- active virus and additional factor: 1
- active virus and live virus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- active virus and live virus isolation: 1
- active virus and load quantification: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and additional factor: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- acute respiratory syndrome and additional strain: 1, 2
- acute respiratory syndrome and live virus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute respiratory syndrome and live virus isolation: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and load quantification: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- acute respiratory syndrome and load sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- acute respiratory syndrome and log median: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- acute respiratory syndrome and log10 average: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and longitudinal sectional: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- additional strain and live virus: 1
- live virus and log median: 1, 2
- load sensitivity and log median: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date