A Semi-Automatic Step-by-Step Expert-Guided LI-RADS Grading System Based on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI

Sheng, Ruofan; Huang, Jing; Zhang, Weiguo; Jin, Kaipu; Yang, Li; Chong, Huanhuan; Fan, Jia; Zhou, Jian; Wu, Dijia; Zeng, Mengsu

PURPOSE: Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) classification, especially the identification of LR-3 to 5 lesions with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) probability, is of great significance to treatment strategy determination. We aimed to develop a semi-automatic LI-RADS grading system on multiphase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI using deep convolutional neural networks (CNN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: An internal data set of 439 patients and external data set of 71 patients with suspected HCC were included and underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. The expert-guided LI-RADS grading system consisted of four deep 3D CNN models including a tumor segmentation model for automatic diameter estimation and three classification models of LI-RADS major features including arterial phase hyper-enhancement (APHE), washout and enhancing capsule. An end-to-end learning system comprising single deep CNN model that directly classified the LI-RADS grade was developed for comparison. RESULTS: On internal testing set, the segmentation model reached a mean dice of 0.84, with the accuracy of mapped diameter intervals as 82.7% (95% CI: 74.4%, 91.7%). The area under the curves (AUCs) were 0.941 (95% CI: 0.914, 0.961), 0.859 (95% CI: 0.823, 0.890) and 0.712 (95% CI: 0.668, 0.754) for APHE, washout and capsule, respectively. The expert-guided system significantly outperformed the end-to-end system with a LI-RADS grading accuracy of 68.3% (95% CI: 60.8%, 76.5%) vs 55.6% (95% CI: 48.8%, 63.0%) (P<0.0001). On external testing set, the accuracy of mapped diameter intervals was 91.5% (95% CI: 81.9%, 100.0%). The AUCs were 0.792 (95% CI: 0.745, 0.833), 0.654 (95% CI: 0.602, 0.703) and 0.658 (95% CI: 0.606, 0.707) for APHE, washout and capsule, respectively. The expert-guided system achieved an overall grading accuracy of 66.2% (95% CI: 58.0%, 75.2%), significantly higher than the end-to-end system of 50.1% (95% CI: 43.1%, 58.1%) (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: We developed a semi-automatic step-by-step expert-guided LI-RADS grading system (LR-3 to 5), superior to the conventional end-to-end learning system. This deep learning-based system may improve workflow efficiency for HCC diagnosis in clinical practice.