Selected article for: "clinical trial and real world"

Author: Lecat, Catherine S. Y.; Taube, Jessica B.; Wilson, William; Carmichael, Jonathan; Parrish, Christopher; Wallis, Gabriel; Kyriakou, Charalampia; Lee, Lydia; Mahmood, Shameem; Papanikolaou, Xenofon; Rabin, Neil K.; Sive, Jonathan; Wechalekar, Ashutosh D.; Yong, Kwee; Cook, Gordon; Popat, Rakesh
Title: Defining Unmet Need Following Lenalidomide Refractoriness: Real-World Evidence of Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma
  • Cord-id: 70z4gbw2
  • Document date: 2021_7_21
  • ID: 70z4gbw2
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: The treatment paradigm for multiple myeloma (MM) continues to evolve with the development of novel therapies and the earlier adoption of continuous treatments into the treatment pathway. Lenalidomide-refractory patients now represent a challenge with inferior progression free survival (PFS) reported to subsequent treatments. We therefore sought to describe the natural history of MM patients following lenalidomide in the real world. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort review of p
    Document: BACKGROUND: The treatment paradigm for multiple myeloma (MM) continues to evolve with the development of novel therapies and the earlier adoption of continuous treatments into the treatment pathway. Lenalidomide-refractory patients now represent a challenge with inferior progression free survival (PFS) reported to subsequent treatments. We therefore sought to describe the natural history of MM patients following lenalidomide in the real world. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort review of patients with relapsed MM who received lenalidomide-based treatments in the U.K. Data were collected for demographics, subsequent therapies, treatment responses, survival outcomes and clinical trial enrollment. RESULTS: 198 patients received lenalidomide-based treatments at a median of 2 prior lines of therapy at a median of 41 months (range 0.5-210) from diagnosis. 114 patients (72% of 158 evaluable) became refractory to lenalidomide. The overall survival (OS) after lenalidomide failure was 14.7 months having received between 0-6 subsequent lines of therapy. Few deep responses were observed with subsequent treatments and the PFS to each further line was < 7 months. There was a steep reduction in numbers of patients able to receive further treatment, with an associated increase in number of deaths. The OS of patients progressing on lenalidomide who did not enter a clinical trial incorporating novel agents was very poor (8.8 months versus 30 months, p 0.0002), although the trials group were a biologically fitter group. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate the poor outcomes of patients failing lenalidomide-based treatments in the real world, the highlight need for more effective treatments.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • absolute percentage and long treatment: 1