Author: Villar, Jesús; Schultz, Marcus J; Kacmarek, Robert M
Title: The LUNG SAFE: a biased presentation of the prevalence of ARDS! Cord-id: dqin9996 Document date: 2016_1_1
ID: dqin9996
Snippet: The recent Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (LUNG SAFE) challenges current data on the prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The LUNG SAFE investigators claimed that their data demonstrated the predictive validity of the Berlin criteria. Also, the LUNG SAFE showed a disturbingly large gap between scientific evidence and medical practice. All of these statements demand that we question the interpretations of the stud
Document: The recent Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (LUNG SAFE) challenges current data on the prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The LUNG SAFE investigators claimed that their data demonstrated the predictive validity of the Berlin criteria. Also, the LUNG SAFE showed a disturbingly large gap between scientific evidence and medical practice. All of these statements demand that we question the interpretations of the study's findings.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome prevalence and lung safe acute respiratory failure: 1
- acute respiratory failure and lung safe acute respiratory failure: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date