Author: Koh, Hock Peng; Shamsudin, Nurul Shaliza; Tan, Marilyn May Yeen; Mohd Pauzi, Zulsairi
Title: The outcomes and acceptance of pressurized meteredâ€dose inhaler bronchodilators with venturi mask modified spacer in the outpatient emergency department during the COVIDâ€19 pandemic Cord-id: onrhgv3x Document date: 2021_3_25
ID: onrhgv3x
Snippet: WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Nebulizer use has been suspended in Malaysian public health facilities due to the potential to aggravate COVIDâ€19 nosocomial transmission. Currently, our facility uses the pressurized meteredâ€dose inhaler (pMDI) bronchodilator with Venturi mask modified spacer (VMMS) in patients visiting the Emergency Department (ED) for mild to moderate exacerbation of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We sought to assess the outcomes and acceptance of pMD
Document: WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Nebulizer use has been suspended in Malaysian public health facilities due to the potential to aggravate COVIDâ€19 nosocomial transmission. Currently, our facility uses the pressurized meteredâ€dose inhaler (pMDI) bronchodilator with Venturi mask modified spacer (VMMS) in patients visiting the Emergency Department (ED) for mild to moderate exacerbation of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We sought to assess the outcomes and acceptance of pMDIâ€VMMS in the outpatient ED of a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. METHODS: We analysed the total visits and discharge rates during periods of using the nebulizer and current pMDIâ€VMMS methods. The acceptance of pMDIâ€VMMS by patients and assistant medical officers (AMOs) were assessed by questionnaire. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We analysed 3184 ED visits and responses from 103 patients and 32 AMOs. The direct discharge rate was similar for both nebulizer (n = 2162, 92.5%) and pMDIâ€VMMS method (n = 768, 90.7%) (pâ€value = 0.120). Twentyâ€eight patients (27.2%) favoured the pMDIâ€VMMS over the nebulizer, whereas 36 patients (35.0%) had no preference for either method. Sixtyâ€four patients (62.1%) felt that the current pMDIâ€VMMS method was better or at least as effective in relieving their symptoms as a nebulizer. The current method was favoured over the nebulizer by twentyâ€seven AMOs (84.4%). Twentyâ€eight (87.5%) AMOs suggested that the current method was more effective than the nebulizer. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The bronchodilator delivered via pMDIâ€VMMS appeared to be comparable to nebulizer in treating mild to moderate asthma and COPD exacerbations in the outpatient ED. Most patients and AMOs accepted the use of pMDIâ€VMMS in the outpatient ED during the current COVIDâ€19 pandemic. The Venturi mask modified spacer can be a cheap and effective alternative to the commercial spacer in a resourceâ€limited situation.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date