Selected article for: "additive explanations and machine learning"

Author: Domínguez-Olmedo, Juan L; Gragera-Martínez, Álvaro; Mata, Jacinto; Pachón Álvarez, Victoria
Title: Machine Learning Applied to Clinical Laboratory Data in Spain for COVID-19 Outcome Prediction: Model Development and Validation
  • Cord-id: x850ee58
  • Document date: 2021_4_14
  • ID: x850ee58
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic is probably the greatest health catastrophe of the modern era. Spain’s health care system has been exposed to uncontrollable numbers of patients over a short period, causing the system to collapse. Given that diagnosis is not immediate, and there is no effective treatment for COVID-19, other tools have had to be developed to identify patients at the risk of severe disease complications and thus optimize material and human resources in health care. There are no
    Document: BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic is probably the greatest health catastrophe of the modern era. Spain’s health care system has been exposed to uncontrollable numbers of patients over a short period, causing the system to collapse. Given that diagnosis is not immediate, and there is no effective treatment for COVID-19, other tools have had to be developed to identify patients at the risk of severe disease complications and thus optimize material and human resources in health care. There are no tools to identify patients who have a worse prognosis than others. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to process a sample of electronic health records of patients with COVID-19 in order to develop a machine learning model to predict the severity of infection and mortality from among clinical laboratory parameters. Early patient classification can help optimize material and human resources, and analysis of the most important features of the model could provide more detailed insights into the disease. METHODS: After an initial performance evaluation based on a comparison with several other well-known methods, the extreme gradient boosting algorithm was selected as the predictive method for this study. In addition, Shapley Additive Explanations was used to analyze the importance of the features of the resulting model. RESULTS: After data preprocessing, 1823 confirmed patients with COVID-19 and 32 predictor features were selected. On bootstrap validation, the extreme gradient boosting classifier yielded a value of 0.97 (95% CI 0.96-0.98) for the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.91) for the area under the precision-recall curve, 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.95) for accuracy, 0.77 (95% CI 0.72-0.83) for the F-score, 0.93 (95% CI 0.89-0.98) for sensitivity, and 0.91 (95% CI 0.86-0.96) for specificity. The 4 most relevant features for model prediction were lactate dehydrogenase activity, C-reactive protein levels, neutrophil counts, and urea levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our predictive model yielded excellent results in the differentiating among patients who died of COVID-19, primarily from among laboratory parameter values. Analysis of the resulting model identified a set of features with the most significant impact on the prediction, thus relating them to a higher risk of mortality.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • accuracy high degree and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute inflammatory syndrome and liver disease: 1
    • acute inflammatory syndrome and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • acute inflammatory syndrome and lung disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute inflammatory syndrome and lung parenchyma: 1, 2
    • acute phase and liver disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute phase and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute phase and loss function: 1
    • acute phase and lung disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute phase and lung parenchyma: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute phase reactant and logistic regression: 1
    • acute renal failure and liver disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • acute renal failure and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
    • acute renal failure and loss function: 1, 2, 3
    • acute renal failure and lung disease: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • additional advantage and logistic regression: 1, 2
    • additional advantage and lung disease: 1
    • additive explanations and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • liver disease and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25