Selected article for: "patient potential risk and potential risk"

Author: Vincent, Alessia; Beck, Katharina; Becker, Christoph; Zumbrunn, Samuel; Ramin-Wright, Maja; Urben, Tabita; Quinto, Adrian; Schaefert, Rainer; Meinlschmidt, Gunther; Gaab, Jens; Reinhardt, Thomas; Bassetti, Stefano; Schuetz, Philipp; Hunziker, Sabina
Title: Psychological burden in patients with COVID-19 and their relatives 90 days after hospitalization: A prospective observational cohort study
  • Cord-id: epszma91
  • Document date: 2021_5_19
  • ID: epszma91
    Snippet: Objective COVID-19 causes psychological distress for patients and their relatives at short term. However, little research addressed the longer-term psychological outcomes in this population. Therefore, we aimed to prospectively assess clinically relevant psychological distress in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and their relatives 90 days after hospital discharge. Methods This exploratory, prospective, observational cohort study included consecutive adult patients hospitalized in two Swiss t
    Document: Objective COVID-19 causes psychological distress for patients and their relatives at short term. However, little research addressed the longer-term psychological outcomes in this population. Therefore, we aimed to prospectively assess clinically relevant psychological distress in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and their relatives 90 days after hospital discharge. Methods This exploratory, prospective, observational cohort study included consecutive adult patients hospitalized in two Swiss tertiary-care hospitals between March and June 2020 for confirmed COVID-19 and their relatives. The primary outcome was psychological distress defined as clinically relevant symptoms of anxiety and/or depression measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) 90 days after discharge. Results Clinically relevant psychological distress 90 days after hospital discharge was present in 23/108 patients (21.3%) and 22/120 relatives (18.3%). For patients, risk and protective factors associated with clinically relevant psychological distress included sociodemographic, illness-related, psychosocial, and hospital-related factors. A model including these factors showed good discrimination, with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.84. For relatives, relevant risk factors were illness-related, psychosocial, and hospital-related factors. Resilience was negatively associated with anxiety and depression in both patients and relatives and regarding PTSD in relatives only. Conclusion COVID-19 is linked to clinically relevant psychological distress in a subgroup of patients and their relatives 90 days after hospitalization. If confirmed in an independent and larger patient cohort, knowledge about these potential risk and protective factors might help to develop preventive strategies.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute stress and adequate support provide: 1
    • acute stress and lung disease: 1, 2
    • adequate support and logistic regression model: 1
    • adequate support provide and logistic regression model: 1
    • logistic regression model and lung disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15