Author: Croteau, Félix; Paradelo, David; Pearsall, David; Robbins, Shawn
Title: Risk Factors for Shoulder Injuries in Water Polo: a Cohort Study Cord-id: greviwu7 Document date: 2021_8_1
ID: greviwu7
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Very limited investigations have been conducted exploring risk factors for injury in water polo players. A gap remains in the literature regarding identification of variables that should be considered as part of player screening evaluations. PURPOSE: To estimate whether previous injury, changes in strength, range of motion (ROM) or upward scapular rotation (UR) are related to shoulder injuries in water polo players. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive cohort study METHODS: Thirty-nine internat
Document: BACKGROUND: Very limited investigations have been conducted exploring risk factors for injury in water polo players. A gap remains in the literature regarding identification of variables that should be considered as part of player screening evaluations. PURPOSE: To estimate whether previous injury, changes in strength, range of motion (ROM) or upward scapular rotation (UR) are related to shoulder injuries in water polo players. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive cohort study METHODS: Thirty-nine international-level players participated (19 males). Shoulder internal (IR) and external rotation (ER) peak torque was measured using an isokinetic device (CONtrex MJ). Shoulder ROM was measured passively using standard goniometry. Scapular UR was measured using a laser digital inclinometer. At baseline players were divided into groups: those with and without previous shoulder injuries. Independent t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the study variables between groups. After nine months, a second analysis compared the same athletes, who were then grouped by those who had or had not sustained new injuries. Effect sizes were calculated with a Hedge’s g. Chi squared analysis compared proportion of injured players with and without previous injury. RESULTS: Eighteen participants (46%) had previous injuries at baseline. Players with a previous injury showed higher peak torques for IR (0.62±0.15 vs 0.54±0.13N/kg, p=0.04, g=0.60); larger loss of IR ROM (9.9±9.1 vs 4.1±7.5°, p=0.04, g=0.68), but no statistical difference in UR (p=0.70). After nine months, there were no statistical strength differences between groups. Loss of IR ROM was significantly higher in the injured group (9.8±9.8 vs 4.0±6.7°, p=0.04, g=0.68), as well as UR (13.0±3.0 vs 10.4±3.3°, p=0.01, g=0.81). History of previous injury was significantly related to developing a new injury (OR 6.5, p=0.02). Logistic regression found previous injury and UR most important contributors to injury risk. CONCLUSIONS: Previous injury, changes in IR ROM and UR are related to new shoulder injuries in water polo, but further variables such as rest, training load, or psychosocial factors may explain the incidence of new injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absolute value and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4
- absolute value and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3
- absolute value and low strength: 1
- acromioclavicular joint and active range: 1
- additional analysis and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- additional analysis and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- additional analysis and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- additional study and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- additional study and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3
- additional understanding and logistic regression: 1
- additional understanding and logistic regression analysis: 1
- logistic regression analysis and low strength: 1, 2
- logistic regression and low strength: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date