Selected article for: "asymptomatic infection and positive test"

Author: Meyers, Kristin J.; Jones, Meghan E.; Goetz, Iris A.; Botros, Fady T.; Knorr, Jack; Manner, David H.; Woodward, Brad
Title: A cross‐sectional community‐based observational study of asymptomatic SARS‐CoV‐2 prevalence in the greater Indianapolis area
  • Cord-id: gtzc69lc
  • Document date: 2020_6_16
  • ID: gtzc69lc
    Snippet: The Asymptomatic novel CORonavirus iNfection (ACORN) study was designed to investigate the prevalence of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in the asymptomatic adult population of the Indianapolis metropolitan area, to follow individuals testing positive for the development of symptoms, and to understand duration of positive test results. ACORN is a cross‐sectional community‐based observational study of adult residents presenting asymptomatic for COVID‐like illness, defined as the self‐reported ab
    Document: The Asymptomatic novel CORonavirus iNfection (ACORN) study was designed to investigate the prevalence of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in the asymptomatic adult population of the Indianapolis metropolitan area, to follow individuals testing positive for the development of symptoms, and to understand duration of positive test results. ACORN is a cross‐sectional community‐based observational study of adult residents presenting asymptomatic for COVID‐like illness, defined as the self‐reported absence of the following 3‐symptoms in the last 7‐days: fever (≥100°F), new onset or worsening cough, and new onset or worsening shortness of breath. SARS‐CoV‐2 infection was determined by RT‐PCR in nasopharyngeal swab samples. SARS‐CoV‐2 infection prevalence was expressed as a point estimate with 95%‐CI. Test results are reported for 2953 participants who enrolled and underwent nasopharyngeal swab testing between April 7, 2020 and May 16, 2020. Among tested participants, 91 (3.1%; 95%‐CI; 2.5%‐3.7%) were positive for SARS‐CoV‐2. Overall, baseline characteristics, medical history, and infection risk factors were comparable between SARS‐CoV‐2 positive and negative participants. Within the ongoing 14‐day follow‐up period for positive participants, 58 (71.6%) of 81‐assessed participants remained asymptomatic while others (n=23, 28.4%) reported one or more symptoms. Indiana had “Stay‐at‐Home” orders in place during nearly the entire test period reported here, yet 3.1% of asymptomatic participants tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2. These results indicate screening questions had limited predictive utility for testing in an asymptomatic population and suggest broader testing strategies are needed. Importantly, these findings underscore that more research is needed to understand the viral transmission and the role asymptomatic and pre‐symptomatic individuals play in this global pandemic. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • longitudinal study and los angeles county: 1, 2