Author: Meyers, Kristin J.; Jones, Meghan E.; Goetz, Iris A.; Botros, Fady T.; Knorr, Jack; Manner, David H.; Woodward, Brad
Title: A crossâ€sectional communityâ€based observational study of asymptomatic SARSâ€CoVâ€2 prevalence in the greater Indianapolis area Cord-id: gtzc69lc Document date: 2020_6_16
ID: gtzc69lc
Snippet: The Asymptomatic novel CORonavirus iNfection (ACORN) study was designed to investigate the prevalence of SARSâ€CoVâ€2 infection in the asymptomatic adult population of the Indianapolis metropolitan area, to follow individuals testing positive for the development of symptoms, and to understand duration of positive test results. ACORN is a crossâ€sectional communityâ€based observational study of adult residents presenting asymptomatic for COVIDâ€like illness, defined as the selfâ€reported ab
Document: The Asymptomatic novel CORonavirus iNfection (ACORN) study was designed to investigate the prevalence of SARSâ€CoVâ€2 infection in the asymptomatic adult population of the Indianapolis metropolitan area, to follow individuals testing positive for the development of symptoms, and to understand duration of positive test results. ACORN is a crossâ€sectional communityâ€based observational study of adult residents presenting asymptomatic for COVIDâ€like illness, defined as the selfâ€reported absence of the following 3â€symptoms in the last 7â€days: fever (≥100°F), new onset or worsening cough, and new onset or worsening shortness of breath. SARSâ€CoVâ€2 infection was determined by RTâ€PCR in nasopharyngeal swab samples. SARSâ€CoVâ€2 infection prevalence was expressed as a point estimate with 95%â€CI. Test results are reported for 2953 participants who enrolled and underwent nasopharyngeal swab testing between April 7, 2020 and May 16, 2020. Among tested participants, 91 (3.1%; 95%â€CI; 2.5%â€3.7%) were positive for SARSâ€CoVâ€2. Overall, baseline characteristics, medical history, and infection risk factors were comparable between SARSâ€CoVâ€2 positive and negative participants. Within the ongoing 14â€day followâ€up period for positive participants, 58 (71.6%) of 81â€assessed participants remained asymptomatic while others (n=23, 28.4%) reported one or more symptoms. Indiana had “Stayâ€atâ€Home†orders in place during nearly the entire test period reported here, yet 3.1% of asymptomatic participants tested positive for SARSâ€CoVâ€2. These results indicate screening questions had limited predictive utility for testing in an asymptomatic population and suggest broader testing strategies are needed. Importantly, these findings underscore that more research is needed to understand the viral transmission and the role asymptomatic and preâ€symptomatic individuals play in this global pandemic. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- longitudinal study and los angeles county: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date