Author: Rensink, M. J.; van Laarhoven, H. W. M.; Holleman, F.
Title: Cocoon vaccination for influenza in patients with a solid tumor: a retrospective study Cord-id: 7bnxgj5g Document date: 2020_11_12
ID: 7bnxgj5g
Snippet: PURPOSE: Oncological patients are susceptible to various severe viral infections, including influenza. Vaccinating oncological patients and their household contacts (“cocoon vaccinationâ€) may protect these patients from contracting influenza. To understand the potential of cocoon vaccination in oncological patients, this study assesses the influenza vaccination status of oncological patients and their household contacts and their considerations regarding the vaccination. METHODS: In this ret
Document: PURPOSE: Oncological patients are susceptible to various severe viral infections, including influenza. Vaccinating oncological patients and their household contacts (“cocoon vaccinationâ€) may protect these patients from contracting influenza. To understand the potential of cocoon vaccination in oncological patients, this study assesses the influenza vaccination status of oncological patients and their household contacts and their considerations regarding the vaccination. METHODS: In this retrospective study, oncological patients with a solid tumor were asked to fill in a questionnaire about their own and their household contacts’ influenza vaccination status in the influenza season of 2018–2019. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were included (response rate 88%). The influenza vaccination rates of oncological patients and their first household contacts were 43.9% and 44.9%, respectively. The majority of vaccinated patients and vaccinated first household contacts had been advised by their general practitioner to get the vaccination. A minority of the first household contacts reported getting vaccinated specifically because of the patient’s vulnerability. Unvaccinated patients and unvaccinated household contacts mainly believed the vaccination was unnecessary or were afraid of side effects. None of the included patients had been hospitalized with influenza. CONCLUSION: The oncological patients’ and first household contacts’ vaccination rates in this study were lower than the vaccination rates of the general Dutch population of over 60 years old, possibly due to a lack of knowledge and misconceptions about the vaccination. Further research is required to establish whether cocoon vaccination can contribute to protecting oncological patients from contracting an influenza infection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-020-05883-2.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absolute risk and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
- absolute risk and low percentage: 1
- actual number and additional information: 1
- actual number and logistic regression: 1, 2
- additional information and living situation: 1
- additional information and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- additional protection and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
- additional protection need and logistic regression: 1
- additional questionnaire and logistic regression: 1, 2
- live people and living situation: 1, 2
- live people and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- live person and living situation: 1, 2
- live person and logistic regression: 1
- living situation and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date