Selected article for: "activity recognition and lr logistic regression"

Author: Rabbi, Jakaria; Fuad, Md. Tahmid Hasan; Awal, Md. Abdul
Title: Human Activity Analysis and Recognition from Smartphones using Machine Learning Techniques
  • Cord-id: z9fr8p15
  • Document date: 2021_3_30
  • ID: z9fr8p15
    Snippet: Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is considered a valuable research topic in the last few decades. Different types of machine learning models are used for this purpose, and this is a part of analyzing human behavior through machines. It is not a trivial task to analyze the data from wearable sensors for complex and high dimensions. Nowadays, researchers mostly use smartphones or smart home sensors to capture these data. In our paper, we analyze these data using machine learning models to recogniz
    Document: Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is considered a valuable research topic in the last few decades. Different types of machine learning models are used for this purpose, and this is a part of analyzing human behavior through machines. It is not a trivial task to analyze the data from wearable sensors for complex and high dimensions. Nowadays, researchers mostly use smartphones or smart home sensors to capture these data. In our paper, we analyze these data using machine learning models to recognize human activities, which are now widely used for many purposes such as physical and mental health monitoring. We apply different machine learning models and compare performances. We use Logistic Regression (LR) as the benchmark model for its simplicity and excellent performance on a dataset, and to compare, we take Decision Tree (DT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Additionally, we select the best set of parameters for each model by grid search. We use the HAR dataset from the UCI Machine Learning Repository as a standard dataset to train and test the models. Throughout the analysis, we can see that the Support Vector Machine performed (average accuracy 96.33%) far better than the other methods. We also prove that the results are statistically significant by employing statistical significance test methods.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • accuracy calculate and machine learning model: 1
    • accuracy case and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • accuracy case and machine learning model: 1
    • accuracy case and machine learning technique: 1
    • accuracy score and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • accuracy score and machine learning model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • accuracy score and machine learning technique: 1, 2
    • accuracy significantly increase and machine learning: 1, 2
    • active research topic and machine learning: 1
    • activity recognition and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • activity type and machine learning: 1
    • location specific and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • location specific and machine learning model: 1
    • logistic regression and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • logistic regression and machine learning model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • logistic regression and machine learning model accuracy: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • logistic regression and machine learning technique: 1, 2, 3
    • low accuracy and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • low accuracy and machine learning model: 1, 2, 3