Author: Stevens, Barry J.
Title: Reporting radiographers’ interpretation and use of the British Society of Thoracic Imaging’s coding system when reporting COVID-19 chest x-rays Cord-id: ygqin14x Document date: 2020_6_18
ID: ygqin14x
Snippet: Abstract Introduction The United Kingdom (UK) has experienced one of the worst initial waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical signs help guide initial diagnosis, though definitive diagnosis is made using the laboratory technique reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The chest x-ray (CXR) is used as the primary imaging investigation in the United Kingdom (UK) for patients with suspected COVID-19. In some hospitals these CXRs may be reported by a radiographer. Methodology Ret
Document: Abstract Introduction The United Kingdom (UK) has experienced one of the worst initial waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical signs help guide initial diagnosis, though definitive diagnosis is made using the laboratory technique reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The chest x-ray (CXR) is used as the primary imaging investigation in the United Kingdom (UK) for patients with suspected COVID-19. In some hospitals these CXRs may be reported by a radiographer. Methodology Retrospective review of CXR reports by radiographers for suspected COVID-19 patients attending the Emergency Department (ED) of a hospital in the UK. Interpretation and use of the British Society of Thoracic Imaging (BSTI) coding system was assessed. Report description and code use were cross-checked. Report and code usage were checked against the RT-PCR result to determine accuracy. Report availability was checked against the availability of the RT-PCR result. A confusion matrix was utilised to determine performance. The data were analysed manually using Excel. Results Sample size was 320 patients; 54.1% male patients (n = 173), 45.9% female patients (n = 147). The correct code matched report descriptions in 316 of the 320 cases (98.8%). In 299 of the 320 cases (93.4%), the reports were available before the RT-PCR swab result. CXR sensitivity for detecting COVID-19 was 85% compared to 93% for the initial RT-PCR. Conclusion Reporting radiographers can adequately utilise and apply the BSTI classification system when reporting COVID-19 CXRs. They can recognise the classic CXR appearances of COVID-19 and those with normal appearances. Future best practice includes checking laboratory results when reporting CXRs with ambiguous appearances. Implications for practice Utilisation of reporting radiographers to report CXRs in any future respiratory pandemic should be considered a service-enabling development.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- accuracy determine and magnetic resonance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- accuracy determine and magnetic resonance ct: 1
- low sensitivity and magnetic resonance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- low sensitivity and magnetic resonance ct: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date