Author: Archer, Thomas; Aziz, Imran; Kurien, Matthew; Knott, Victoria; Ball, Alex
                    Title: Prioritisation of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic: outcomes of a novel triage pathway  Cord-id: z3fr1dbo  Document date: 2021_6_7
                    ID: z3fr1dbo
                    
                    Snippet: OBJECTIVE: The 2-week-wait (2ww) referral pathway is used in England to fast-track patients with suspected colorectal cancer (CRC). A two-stage triage pathway was used to prioritise lower gastrointestinal (LGI) endoscopy for suspected CRC during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: All patients referred for an LGI endoscopy via a 2ww referral pathway between March 2020 and July 2020 were assessed. The first stage triaged patients to high, standard or low risk of CRC based on symptoms and faecal immuno
                    
                    
                    
                     
                    
                    
                    
                    
                        
                            
                                Document: OBJECTIVE: The 2-week-wait (2ww) referral pathway is used in England to fast-track patients with suspected colorectal cancer (CRC). A two-stage triage pathway was used to prioritise lower gastrointestinal (LGI) endoscopy for suspected CRC during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: All patients referred for an LGI endoscopy via a 2ww referral pathway between March 2020 and July 2020 were assessed. The first stage triaged patients to high, standard or low risk of CRC based on symptoms and faecal immunochemical test (FIT), and offered CT scans to those at high risk. The second stage, endoscopy prioritisation (EP), incorporated the CT results, FIT and symptoms to triage into four groups, EP1–EP4; with EP1 being the most urgent and EP4 the least. The primary outcome measure was CRC detection. RESULTS: 514 patients were included. The risk of CRC was triaged as high in 190/514 patients (37%), standard in 274/514 patients (53%) and low in 50/514 (10%) patients. 422/514 patients (82%) underwent endoscopy with triage to EP1 in 52/422 (12%), EP2 in 105/422 (25%), EP3 in 210/422 (50%) and EP4 in 55/422 (13%). CRC was detected in 23 patients (5.4%). CRC was significantly more frequent in the EP1 group (23.1%, relative risk (RR)=16.2) and EP2 group (6.7%, RR=4.7) compared with EP3 group (1.4%). All CRC lesions were identified by CT imaging when performed prior to LGI endoscopy. CONCLUSION: This triage pathway designated 83% of patients with CRC to either EP1 or EP2. During a period of limited endoscopy provision, this pathway effectively prioritises endoscopy for those at greatest risk of CRC.
 
  Search related documents: 
                                Co phrase  search for related documents- abdominal pain and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
  - abdominal pain and long term outcome: 1, 2, 3
  - adaptation translation and logistic regression: 1
  - adaptation translation and logistic regression analysis: 1
  - additional burden and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
  - additional burden and low priority: 1
  - additional resource and low priority: 1
  - logistic regression analysis and long term outcome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
  - logistic regression and long term outcome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
  - logistic regression and low priority: 1, 2, 3
  - logistic regression and low standard: 1, 2, 3
  
 
                                Co phrase  search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date