Author: Abdoli, Samereh; Silveira, Monica S. V. M.; Doosti-Irani, Mehri; Fanti, Paulo; Miller-Bains, Katherine; Pavin, Elizabeth João; Cardoso, Edimariz Buin; Vardanjani, Leila Rafiee; Noorjan, Kobra; Hessler, Danielle
Title: Cross-national comparison of psychosocial well-being and diabetes outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic in US, Brazil, and Iran Cord-id: zabaan7p Document date: 2021_6_11
ID: zabaan7p
Snippet: BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic is a global public health emergency, which presents wide-ranging negative impacts on individuals with diabetes. To examine psychosocial well-being and diabetes outcomes in individuals with type 1 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic, and investigate how these factors vary in different countries. METHODS: Between April and June 2020 we employed a cross national comparative research study in the United States (US), Brazil, and Iran to collect data from 1788 adult
Document: BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic is a global public health emergency, which presents wide-ranging negative impacts on individuals with diabetes. To examine psychosocial well-being and diabetes outcomes in individuals with type 1 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic, and investigate how these factors vary in different countries. METHODS: Between April and June 2020 we employed a cross national comparative research study in the United States (US), Brazil, and Iran to collect data from 1788 adults with type 1 diabetes using web-based survey. Study participants answered questions relevant to diabetes distress, diabetes burnout, depressive symptoms, COVID-19 related changes, and socio-demographic characteristics. They also reported their last Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and daily Time-in-Range (TiR) blood glucose. We analyzed data using comparative tests (Chi-square, Kruskal–Wallis and McNemar test), logistic and linear regression adjusted for fixed effects. RESULTS: There were significant changes prior and during the pandemic regarding access to diabetes care, diabetes supplies and medications, healthy food and safe places to exercise in all countries (p < 0.05). Participants in Iran experienced higher levels of diabetes distress (57.1%), diabetes burnout (50%), and depressive symptoms (60.9%), followed by Brazil and US (p < 0.0001). US participants reported better glycemic control (HbA1c = 6.97%, T1R = 69.64%) compared to Brazil (HbA1c = 7.94%, T1R = 51.95%) and Iran (HbA1c = 7.47%, T1R = 51.53%) (p < 0.0001). There were also significant relationships between psychosocial well-being, diabetes outcomes, socio-demographic data, and COVID-19 related challenges in overall sample (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of differences among US, Brazil, and Iran, our findings revealed that different countries may experience similar challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic which can impact negatively diabetes outcomes and psychosocial well-being in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Countries need to consider modifiable variables associated with poor diabetes outcomes and sub optimal psychosocial well-being and target vulnerable population using significant socio-demographic variables. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13098-021-00681-0.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acute complication and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- acute complication and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- acute complication and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4
- acute complication and low percentage: 1
- acute complication and low prevalence: 1, 2
- additional association and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
- additional association and logistic regression analysis: 1
- adequate medication and logistic regression: 1
- adequate medication and logistic regression analysis: 1
- adequate medication and logistic regression model: 1
- logistic regression analysis and low frequency: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- logistic regression analysis and low percentage: 1, 2, 3, 4
- logistic regression analysis and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- logistic regression and low educational level: 1, 2
- logistic regression and low frequency: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- logistic regression and low percentage: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- logistic regression and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- logistic regression model and low frequency: 1
- logistic regression model and low percentage: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date