Author: Ioannidis, John P. A.
Title: Over- and under-estimation of COVID-19 deaths Cord-id: fgj2lvbg Document date: 2021_7_28
ID: fgj2lvbg
Snippet: The ratio of COVID-19-attributable deaths versus “true†COVID-19 deaths depends on the synchronicity of the epidemic wave with population mortality; duration of test positivity, diagnostic time window, and testing practices close to and at death; infection prevalence; the extent of diagnosing without testing documentation; and the ratio of overall (all-cause) population mortality rate and infection fatality rate. A nomogram is offered to assess the potential extent of over- and under-countin
Document: The ratio of COVID-19-attributable deaths versus “true†COVID-19 deaths depends on the synchronicity of the epidemic wave with population mortality; duration of test positivity, diagnostic time window, and testing practices close to and at death; infection prevalence; the extent of diagnosing without testing documentation; and the ratio of overall (all-cause) population mortality rate and infection fatality rate. A nomogram is offered to assess the potential extent of over- and under-counting in different situations. COVID-19 deaths were apparently under-counted early in the pandemic and continue to be under-counted in several countries, especially in Africa, while over-counting probably currently exists for several other countries, especially those with intensive testing and high sensitization and/or incentives for COVID-19 diagnoses. Death attribution in a syndemic like COVID-19 needs great caution. Finally, excess death estimates are subject to substantial annual variability and include also indirect effects of the pandemic and the effects of measures taken. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10654-021-00787-9.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date