Author: Nasa Sinnott-Armstrong; Daniel Klein; Brendan Hickey
Title: Evaluation of Group Testing for SARS-CoV-2 RNA Document date: 2020_3_30
ID: bgm3bt78_15
Snippet: 3. Similarly, the random assignment of individuals to wells, which is much easier than clinical-risk-driven ordering, has nearly the same improvement ( Figure S1 ). In addition, the total improvement in tests between group testing everyone and only group testing low-risk individuals is nearly indistinguishable at testing prevalence below 10%, suggesting that either is an equally useful option to pursue......
Document: 3. Similarly, the random assignment of individuals to wells, which is much easier than clinical-risk-driven ordering, has nearly the same improvement ( Figure S1 ). In addition, the total improvement in tests between group testing everyone and only group testing low-risk individuals is nearly indistinguishable at testing prevalence below 10%, suggesting that either is an equally useful option to pursue.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- group test group and test group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- group test group test and test group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- low risk and prevalence test: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- low risk and risk drive: 1, 2, 3, 4
- low risk and test group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- low risk individual test and test group: 1
- prevalence test and risk drive: 1
- prevalence test and test group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date