Selected article for: "random number and simulation run"

Author: Nasa Sinnott-Armstrong; Daniel Klein; Brendan Hickey
Title: Evaluation of Group Testing for SARS-CoV-2 RNA
  • Document date: 2020_3_30
  • ID: bgm3bt78_45
    Snippet: We provide an overview of the simulation methods employed. We evaluated models using a sampling approach, drawing samples from either a Bernoulli distribution with a probability equal to the assumed prevalence, or a beta-Bernoulli distribution with α parameter 5 and β parameter 5/prevalence to account for inter-individual variation in risk. All draws were independent. These were averaged over 1000 replicates to smooth over any sampling noise; s.....
    Document: We provide an overview of the simulation methods employed. We evaluated models using a sampling approach, drawing samples from either a Bernoulli distribution with a probability equal to the assumed prevalence, or a beta-Bernoulli distribution with α parameter 5 and β parameter 5/prevalence to account for inter-individual variation in risk. All draws were independent. These were averaged over 1000 replicates to smooth over any sampling noise; sample sizes are adjustable in our web interface. Next, the draws are used to assign true case status for each simulation run. The number of random values thus corresponds directly to the count of cases tested by a given method in a single batch. Of note, the draws from the beta are used as the case probability directly for the row major ordered case prevalence tests ( Figure S1 ), which are only informative under the beta-Bernoulli simulations.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • assumed prevalence and sample size: 1
    • Bernoulli distribution and beta Bernoulli distribution: 1