Selected article for: "adjusted analysis and admission outcome"

Author: Knudtzen, Fredrikke Christie; Jensen, Thøger Gorm; Lindvig, Susan Olaf; Rasmussen, Line Dahlerup; Madsen, Lone Wulff; Hoegh, Silje Vermedal; Bek-Thomsen, Malene; Laursen, Christian B.; Nielsen, Stig Lønberg; Johansen, Isik Somuncu
Title: SARS-CoV-2 viral load as a predictor for disease severity in outpatients and hospitalised patients with COVID-19: A prospective cohort study
  • Cord-id: 8w1wspjd
  • Document date: 2021_10_12
  • ID: 8w1wspjd
    Snippet: INTRODUCTION: We aimed to examine if severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycle quantification (C(q)) value, as a surrogate for SARS-CoV-2 viral load, could predict hospitalisation and disease severity in adult patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of adult patients with PCR positive SARS-CoV-2 airway samples including all out-patients registered at the Department of Infectious D
    Document: INTRODUCTION: We aimed to examine if severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycle quantification (C(q)) value, as a surrogate for SARS-CoV-2 viral load, could predict hospitalisation and disease severity in adult patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of adult patients with PCR positive SARS-CoV-2 airway samples including all out-patients registered at the Department of Infectious Diseases, Odense University Hospital (OUH) March 9-March 17 2020, and all hospitalised patients at OUH March 10-April 21 2020. To identify associations between C(q)-values and a) hospital admission and b) a severe outcome, logistic regression analyses were used to compute odds ratios (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI), adjusting for confounding factors (aOR). RESULTS: We included 87 non-hospitalised and 82 hospitalised patients. The median baseline C(q)-value was 25.5 (interquartile range 22.3–29.0). We found a significant association between increasing C(q)-value and hospital-admission in univariate analysis (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04–1.19). However, this was due to an association between time from symptom onset to testing and C(q)-values, and no association was found in the adjusted analysis (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.94–1.23). In hospitalised patients, a significant association between lower C(q)-values and higher risk of severe disease was found (aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.98), independent of timing of testing. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 PCR C(q)-values in outpatients correlated with time after symptom onset, but was not a predictor of hospitalisation. However, in hospitalised patients lower C(q)-values were associated with higher risk of severe disease.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents