Selected article for: "bias risk and main outcome"

Author: Uribe, Francisca; Alister, Juan Pablo; Zaror, Carlos; Olate, Sergio; Fariña, Rodrigo
Title: Alveolar Cleft Reconstruction Using Morphogenetic Protein (rhBMP-2): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
  • Cord-id: isrba0cq
  • Document date: 2019_11_7
  • ID: isrba0cq
    Snippet: OBJECTIVE This study aimed to review the existing evidence regarding reconstruction of the alveolar cleft using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in terms of bone volume and bone height. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. PATIENTS—PARTICIPANTS A systematic search was done. Randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials, where rhBMP-2 was used in the reconstruction of human alveolar cleft were included. INTERVENTIONS Reconstruction of alveolar cleft with rhBMP-2. M
    Document: OBJECTIVE This study aimed to review the existing evidence regarding reconstruction of the alveolar cleft using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in terms of bone volume and bone height. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. PATIENTS—PARTICIPANTS A systematic search was done. Randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials, where rhBMP-2 was used in the reconstruction of human alveolar cleft were included. INTERVENTIONS Reconstruction of alveolar cleft with rhBMP-2. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Average bone volume formation and average bone height formation in the alveolar cleft. Mean difference was calculated and pooled by meta-analysis. RESULTS Of 709 identified articles, 5 studies met the inclusion criteria. The average bone volume formation was higher in the rhBMP-2 group than in the control group (61.11% vs 59.12%). The average bone height formation was higher in the control group compared to the rhBMP-2 group (75.4% vs 61.5%). The risk of bias in the selected articles was high. The meta-analysis showed that rhBMP-2 treatment may benefit bone formation compared to iliac crest graft (low certainty evidence; mean difference: -208.76; 95% confidence interval: -253.59 to -163.93; -I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS The results obtained in primary articles are promising but have a high risk of bias and have low quality of evidence; therefore, it is necessary to conduct controlled clinical trials with a greater number of patients to recommend the use of rhBMP-2 in the treatment of the alveolar cleft. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018077741.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Try single phrases listed below for: 1
    Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date