Author: Caruana, G.; Lebrun, L.-L.; Aebischer, O.; Opota, O.; Urbano, L.; DeRham, M.; Marchetti, O.; Greub, G.
Title: The dark side of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing: screening asymptomatic patients. Cord-id: 7tng7twi Document date: 2021_4_27
ID: 7tng7twi
Snippet: Most of the reports describing SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests (RATs) performances derive from COVID-19 symptomatic subjects in outpatient settings during periods of highest incidence of infections and high rates of hospital admissions. Here we investigated the role of RATs in an Emergency Department, as a screening tool before admission for COVID-19 asymptomatic patients. Each patient was screened with two simultaneous nasopharyngeal swabs: one immediately analyzed at the bedside using RAT and t
Document: Most of the reports describing SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests (RATs) performances derive from COVID-19 symptomatic subjects in outpatient settings during periods of highest incidence of infections and high rates of hospital admissions. Here we investigated the role of RATs in an Emergency Department, as a screening tool before admission for COVID-19 asymptomatic patients. Each patient was screened with two simultaneous nasopharyngeal swabs: one immediately analyzed at the bedside using RAT and the other sent to the laboratory for RT-PCR analysis. A total of 116 patients were screened at hospital admission in a 250-bed community hospital in Morges (EHC), Switzerland. With a disease prevalence of 6% based on RT-PCR results, RAT detected only two out of seven RT-PCR positive patients (sensitivity 28.6%) and delivered two false positive results (specificity 98.2%), thus resulting not fiable enough to be used as a screening method in this clinical scenario.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date