Author: Asimakopoulou, Koula; Hoorens, Vera; Speed, Ewen; Coulson, Neil S.; Antoniszczak, Dominika; Collyer, Fran; Deschrijver, Eliane; Dubbin, Leslie; Faulks, Denise; Forsyth, Rowena; Goltsi, Vicky; Harsløf, Ivan; Larsen, Kristian; Manaras, Irene; Olczakâ€Kowalczyk, Dorota; Willis, Karen; Xenou, Tatiana; Scambler, Sasha
Title: Comparative optimism about infection and recovery from COVIDâ€19; Implications for adherence with lockdown advice Cord-id: ctfvd89x Document date: 2020_9_27
ID: ctfvd89x
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Comparative optimism, the belief that negative events are more likely to happen to others rather than to oneself, is well established in health risk research. It is unknown, however, whether comparative optimism also permeates people’s health expectations and potentially behaviour during the COVIDâ€19 pandemic. OBJECTIVES: Data were collected through an international survey (N = 6485) exploring people’s thoughts and psychosocial behaviours relating to COVIDâ€19. This paper repo
Document: BACKGROUND: Comparative optimism, the belief that negative events are more likely to happen to others rather than to oneself, is well established in health risk research. It is unknown, however, whether comparative optimism also permeates people’s health expectations and potentially behaviour during the COVIDâ€19 pandemic. OBJECTIVES: Data were collected through an international survey (N = 6485) exploring people’s thoughts and psychosocial behaviours relating to COVIDâ€19. This paper reports UK data on comparative optimism. In particular, we examine the belief that negative events surrounding risk and recovery from COVIDâ€19 are perceived as more likely to happen to others rather than to oneself. METHODS: Using online snowball sampling through social media, anonymous UK survey data were collected from N = 645 adults during weeks 5â€8 of the UK COVIDâ€19 lockdown. The sample was normally distributed in terms of age and reflected the UK ethnic and disability profile. FINDINGS: Respondents demonstrated comparative optimism where they believed that as compared to others of the same age and gender, they were unlikely to experience a range of controllable (eg accidentally infect/ be infected) and uncontrollable (eg need hospitalization/ intensive care treatment if infected) COVIDâ€19â€related risks in the short term (P < .001). They were comparatively pessimistic (ie thinking they were more at risk than others for developing COVIDâ€19â€related infection or symptoms) when thinking about the next year. DISCUSSION: This is the first ever study to report compelling comparative biases in UK adults’ thinking about COVIDâ€19 We discuss ways in which such thinking may influence adherence with lockdown regimes as these are being relaxed in the UK.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date