Author: Leibar Tamayo, A; Linares Espinós, E; RÃos González, E; Trelles Guzmán, C; Ãlvarez Maestro, M; De Castro Guerin, C; Fernández-Pascual, E; de Francisco, M Girón; de Vicente, J M Gómez; Gómez Rivas, J; Mainez Rodriguez, J A; Pérez Carral, J R; MarÃa, Justa Garcia-Matres; Martinez-Piñeiro Lorenzo, L
Title: Evaluación de la teleconsulta en el paciente urológico durante la pandemia COVID 19 Cord-id: i67ev9rg Document date: 2020_6_18
ID: i67ev9rg
Snippet: Abstract Introduction: The global pandemic of COVID-19 has led to rapid implementation of telemedicine, but there is little information on patient satisfaction of this system as an alternative to face-to-face care. Objective. To evaluate urological patient satisfaction with teleconsultation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and methods: Observational, prospective, cross-sectional, non-interventional study carried out by telephone survey during the period considered as the peak of the pandem
Document: Abstract Introduction: The global pandemic of COVID-19 has led to rapid implementation of telemedicine, but there is little information on patient satisfaction of this system as an alternative to face-to-face care. Objective. To evaluate urological patient satisfaction with teleconsultation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and methods: Observational, prospective, cross-sectional, non-interventional study carried out by telephone survey during the period considered as the peak of the pandemic (March-April 2020). A quality survey composed of 11 questions on urological care provided by physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic was conducted, selecting a representative sample of patients attended by teleconsultation. Results: Two hundred patients were contacted by telephone to answer a survey on the quality of teleconsultation. The distribution of patients surveyed among the specialized consultations was homogeneous with the number of consultations cited in the period;18% of them required assistance from family members. Sixty percent of patients avoided going to a medical center during the pandemic. Of the surveyed patients, 42% had cancelled diagnostic tests, 59% had cancelled medical consultations, 3.5% had cancelled treatments and 1%, had cancelled interventions. Ten percent reported a worsening of urological symptoms during confinement. According to physicians, consultations were effectively delivered in 72% of cases, with teleconsultation being carried out by their usual urologist in 81%. Teleconsultation overall satisfaction level was 9 (IQI 8-10), and 61.5% of respondents consider teleconsultation as a "health care option" after the healthcare crisis. Conclusion: Teleconsultation has been evaluated with a high level of satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic, offering continuous care to urological patients during the healthcare crisis. The perceived quality offers a field of optional telematic assistance in selected patients, which should be re-evaluated in a period without confinement measures.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date